WSPC03491 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I with cultural resources until the Supplement to the I Final EIS is completed is granted. Other, non-ground- disturbing activities may proceed. I Octoper 13, 1992 Reclamation files the Draft Supplement (DES 92-41) and initiates public review and comment. About 500 I comments were received by December 15, 1992. November 30 - Public hearings in Durango, Colorado; Farmington, I December 2, 1992 New Mexico, on December 1, 1992, and Denver, Colorado. About 125 statements received from the hearings. I March 1993 Project re-pricing initiated to reflect current costs trends and project refinements and additions. I June 24,1993 Reclamation completes Design C for the Durango Pumping Plant. I July 20, 1993 The Cornmissioner of Reclamation issues a memorandum recommending a Final Supplement to I the 1980 Final EIS. It is to address issues raised during the comment period, and be based on updating impacts of the project described in the 1979 Definite I Plan Report (including refinements). It also will address Clean Water Act compliance requirements. Nov. - Dec. 1993 Using 638 contracting procedures, cooperative I agreements are put in place with both the Southern Ute I Indian Tribe and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe to conduct certain studies and analyses to help complete the Final Supplement. I 1994 P.L. 93-638 amended to include all Department ofthe Interior agencies. I February 16, 1994 Consent decree is filed regarding the Four Corners Action Coalition et al. lawsuit. Reclamation agrees to I not perform cultural resources related ground disturbing activities prior to completion ofthe Final Supplement. The previous preliminary injunction is I vacated. February 23, 1994 Design funds redirected from Durango Pumping Plant I to preparing the 1980 EIS Supplement. I 1-5 I