My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03188
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC03188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:34:12 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:47:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.625
Description
Wild and Scenic - Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/31/1983
Author
CWCB
Title
Wild and Scenic River Studies - Colorado Rivers - 8-31-83 through 9-25-85 With Issues Page - Fact Sheet - Addendum to Final EIS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />oo~ooo <br /> <br />The classification levels for the eligible segments would be <br />as follows: <br /> <br />(1) Mainstem below McPhee Dam <br /> <br />below McPhee Dam site to Bridge at Bradfield Ranch (11 <br />miles)--recreational <br />Bridge at Bradfield Ranch to Disappointment Creek (41 <br />miles)--scenic <br />Disappointment Creek to Little Gypsum Valley Bridge {20 <br />miles)--recreational <br />Little Gypsum Valley Bridge to 1 mile above Colorado <br />Highway 90 bridge near BedroCk (33 miles)--wild <br /> <br />(2) West Dolores <br /> <br />All 35 miles--recreational <br /> <br />Issues and Concerns (as expressed by the public) <br /> <br />The public response to the. Dolores Wild and Scenic River <br />Study was, for the most part, divided along the lines of two <br />dissimilar philosophies. On the one hand, citizens living in the <br />river area supported the Dolores project and viewed wild and <br />scenic river designation as a direct and serious threat to McPhee <br />Dam, centerpiece of the Dolores Project. These individuals also <br />expressed concern about the effects that designation would have <br />on privately owned lands and resource developments (especially <br />agriculture and water use). They thought there was already <br />enough federal land control on the river. <br /> <br />On the other hand, conservationists and white water <br />enthusiasts, usually living in areas remote from the river, <br />supported maximum wild and scenic river designation. Some <br />suggested that the study be done on the entire river, including <br />those segments excluded in P.L. 93-621. From their point of <br />view, additional protection of the river was both desirable and <br />needed. <br /> <br />Study Team Recommendation <br /> <br />The study team recommended that the 105 miles of the Dolores <br />River from McPhee Dam to 1 mile above the Colorado Highway 90 <br />bridge at Bedrock be designated with classification of reaches as <br />set forth above under "Eligibility and Classification." <br /> <br />The study team further recommended that designation should <br />include a provision to modify the area withdrawn from mineral <br />development, using the following or similar language; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.