|
<br />TABLE S-l
<br />Summarized Comparison of Alternatives
<br />
<br />o
<br />o
<br />r.......,
<br />"'"
<br />.."
<br />en
<br />
<br />Proposed Maaagement Actio..
<br />
<br />Preferred Alternative
<br />
<br /> E'-I Manogement Alternative Natutal Resonn:e F.nhancement Resource Produc:tioo Enhancement
<br /> Alternative -
<br /> Open stAndard leasing - 356,650 acres Open standard leasing - \45,30\ acres Open standard leasing - 597,646 acres
<br /> (58%) (23,5%) (96%)
<br /> Open for leasing with various timitatmns Open fur leasing with VBrious limilalions Open for leasing with various limitations
<br /> - 248,596 acres (39%) - 384,105 acres (62%) - 14,010 acres (2.5%)
<br /> Leasing with NSO - 12,005 acres (2.5%) Leasing with NSO - 87,845 acres (\4%) Leasing with NSO - 5,595 acres (1%)
<br />::0- Oosed to Leasing - 3.620 acres (0.5%) Oosed to Leasing - 3,620 acres (0.5%) Oosed to leasing - 3.620 acres (0.5%)
<br />
<br />Fluid Minerals Maaagement
<br />
<br />c-"'"
<br />
<br />Open standard leasing - 2\9,29\ acres
<br />(35%)
<br />
<br />Open {or leasing with various limitations
<br />- 384.105 acres (62%)
<br />
<br />Leasing with NSO - 13,855 acres (2,5%)
<br />
<br />Oosed to leasing - 3,620 acres (0,5%)
<br />
<br />--.....-.--.-....--....--.....---....---..---.....--....---....---....----...____...____.h___....___....__..u....__nh__..._.n...__.nu...uu__....................Uh...U.....__........h._....._.uh_n....._h___..__no.h_....____..___._..___....__...............__...._____...
<br />
<br />Open to entry - 605.921 acres (98%)
<br />
<br />Locatable Minerals Manogement
<br />
<br />Open to entry - 610,621 acres (98%)
<br />
<br />Withdrawn from enlly - 10,250 acres
<br />(2%)
<br />
<br />Open to enlly 601,665 acres (97%)
<br />
<br />Withdrawn from enlly - 19,206 acres
<br />(3%)
<br />
<br />Open to enlly - 617,571 acres (99%)
<br />
<br />Withdrawn from enlly - 3,300 acres (1%)
<br />
<br />Withdrawn from entry - 14,950 acres
<br />(2%)
<br />
<br />en M/Dends_~
<br />,
<br />N
<br />
<br />u..___..hn.....u..n..__...Uh._...__.Uh_..................nu........_n.hnn..._.nuun.......h.........u.n...__uuh.....hnn.__....._....__...uu_...u.nn.unh...Un.......u_n...._.....................u.........._......._....___..u....____...___...____....
<br />
<br />Open for disposal- 601,162 acres (97%)
<br />
<br />PoIeootoIogk:aI Resnun:es
<br />
<br />Riparian Resoun:e Manogemeut
<br />
<br />Uvesto<k Gl'IlZIng Manogemeut
<br />
<br />Open for disposaI- 613,176 acres (99%)
<br />- Oosed to disposal- 7,695 acres (\%)
<br />
<br />Provide inventory and protection for sur.
<br />fire disturbing proposals.
<br />
<br />Good to exa:IIent oondition on \,400
<br />acres, fair condition on 74 acres, and
<br />poor condition on 274 acres would be
<br />maintained. 880 acres of additional ripar-
<br />ian vegetation would be redeveloped
<br />(mostly bistoric wetlands) and about
<br />1,413 additional aaes would be invento-
<br />ried. Changes in livestock: management
<br />would improve condition on 70 acres.
<br />
<br />32,400 AUMs would be available to
<br />grazing domestic tivestock.
<br />
<br />A portion of !he potential 11,500 AUMs
<br />would be available to tivestOCk (based on
<br />monitoring),
<br />
<br />Open for disposal- 525,643 acres (84%)
<br />
<br />Oosed to disposal- 95,228 acres (\6%)
<br />
<br />Provide intensive inventory and protec.
<br />lion, interprdatioo, and IJIBIIlI8l'IIICnl A
<br />public edllCOtional foosi1 dig site provided.
<br />
<br />Good to excellent condition would be
<br />maintained on 1,400 actCS; fair and/or
<br />poor condition would be improved on
<br />400 acres; 15 acres would remain in poor
<br />COnditiOIL \,370 acres of additional ripar-
<br />ian vegetation would be redeveloped
<br />(mostly bistoric wetlands) and about
<br />1,413 additional acres would be
<br />inventoried
<br />
<br />32,400 AUMs would be available to
<br />grazing domestic tivestock.
<br />
<br />A potential increase of additional AUM
<br />would not be available to livestock.
<br />
<br />Open for disposaI- 616.476 acres (99%)
<br />
<br />Clnsed to disposaI- 4,395 acres (\%)
<br />
<br />Provide inventory and protection for, sur-
<br />fire disturbing proposals.
<br />
<br />Good to exceUent condition on 1,400
<br />acres, fair condition on 74 acres, and
<br />poor condition on 287 acres would be
<br />maintained. 475 acres of additional
<br />riparian vegetation would be redeveloped
<br />(mostly bislOric wetlands) and about
<br />1,413 additional acres would be invento-
<br />ried . Changes in live:stock management
<br />would improve condjtion on 70 acres,
<br />
<br />32,400 AUMs would be available to
<br />grazing domestic livestock.
<br />
<br />AIl of a potential increase of 11,500
<br />AUMs would be available to tivestock.
<br />
<br />Oosed to disposal- 19,709 acres (3%)
<br />
<br />Provide intensive inventory and protec--
<br />tion, interpretatiOl1, and management A
<br />public edllCOtional foosil dig site provided.
<br />
<br />Good to excellent condition would be
<br />maintained on 1,400 acres; fair or poor
<br />condition would be improved on 400
<br />acres; 1 S acres would remain in poor
<br />condition. 1,370 acres of additional ripar.
<br />ian vegetation would be redeveloped
<br />(mostly historic wetlands) and about
<br />1,413 additional acres would be
<br />inventoried.
<br />
<br />32,400 AUMs would be available to
<br />grazing domestic livestoek.
<br />
<br />A portion (40% or 4,600 AUMs) of !he
<br />potential increase of 11,500 AUMs
<br />would be available to livestock,
<br />
|