My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02841
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC02841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:32:47 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1989
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Office of the Inspector General Audit Report - Survey Report on the Review of the CRBSCP
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OG22tl~- <br /> <br />..:..??:::-;: = :.: -' <br />?a~e 7 >2: :. <br /> <br />3rd sentence: Change "90" to "96: <br /> <br /> <br />5th sentence: Change "72" to ''73.'' <br /> <br /> <br />Pa~e 5. Para~aph :-lo. 2 <br /> <br />2nd sentence: Change "1991" to "1992". <br /> <br />5th sentence: Change "high annual river flows" to "record high annual river flows." <br /> <br />Pa~e 6. Para~aph No.2 <br />1st sentence: After "seven basin states" add "and approved by EP A" <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />PROGRA\1 IMPLEMENT AnON <br /> <br />Paie 9 Para~aph No.1 <br /> <br />1st sentence: No facts are provided to support the statement that, "the ultimate <br />effectiveness and efficiency of both appear questionable: <br /> <br />3rd sentence: Stating that "despite expenditures of over $312 million, the desalting plant <br />authorized under Title I is still not complete," infers that all S312 million was for the <br />plant when, in reality, only S136 million was expended for the plant. (Expenditures were <br />taken from the fiscal year 1989 Budget Justification Submittal.) The phrase, "Title I is <br />still not complete, and when completed, it may not be capable of performing its purpose <br />in a fully effective manner," has not been supported by facts. We believe that the <br />desal ting plant will meet its stated objective, <br /> <br />4th sentence: The $316 cost per acre-foot is not supported by documentation. <br />Regarding the statement that Title I may "no longer be economically justified": the <br />program was not initiated on economic considerations. (See co=ents on cover <br />memorandum.) <br /> <br />Title I - Desaltin~ Complex <br /> <br />Pa~e 10. Para~aph No.1 <br /> <br />2nd sentence: For the sake of specificity, change the phrase, "problems with planning <br />and protests regarding equipment contracts" to "design changes to incorporate state.of- <br />the-art technology, budget constraints brought about by political de-emphasis on <br />domestic programs and protests regarding desalting membrane contract awards." <br /> <br />4th sentence: After "$485 million" add "at 96 million gallons per day capacity." <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.