My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02841
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC02841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:32:47 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1989
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Office of the Inspector General Audit Report - Survey Report on the Review of the CRBSCP
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o u 22uj-- <br /> <br />A?PE~-C rx ) <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />PL 98-569 established cost-effectiveness a decisionmaking criteria; :.be Bureau strictly <br />follows that criteria in assessing individual salinity projects. <br /> <br />Recommendation No.2 <br /> <br />Comply with the Omce of Management and Budget (OMB) request provided in the <br />1989 budget pass back to develop and submit an analysis of the economic feasibility of <br />operating the desalting plant. This analysis should include alternative means of <br />.complying with the salinity standards and their potential efTect on the water allocations <br />of the basin states. <br /> <br />Response <br /> <br />Complied. Subsequent to the OMB request, an informal response was made to the <br />OMB Examiner in the process of responding to all passback infor.nation requests. <br />Based on those discussions. .the Bureau of Reclamation concluded :.bat OMB's request <br />had been fulfilled. However, we intend to contact OMB to verify that this is tbe case. <br /> <br />Recommendation No.3 <br /> <br />Discontinue further efTort on the eight investigations of projects to control natural salt <br />sources in any state which does not agree to issue water use permits for such projects. <br /> <br />Response <br /> <br />. <br />~-- ,~ <br />-- -':) <br /> <br />Do not concur. Our objective is to encourage the States to cooperate in salinity <br />projects. therefore stopping the investigation is not a reasonable soiution. If water rights <br />were an issue on a viable option. we would then direct our energies toward facilitating <br />solutions to problems consistent with the philosophy of state primacy on water rights. <br /> <br />Reclamation has only two active investigations in the salinity control program for fiscal <br />year 1989: (1) San Juan River Unit and (2) Price-San Rafael Ri\'el'S Unit. These <br />~emaining investigations do not currently have water rights permit problems. . <br /> <br />Recommendation No.4 <br /> <br />Establish policies and procedures covering work initiated on private irrigation facilities <br />to eliminate the approval of features not essential to the accomplishment of salinity <br />reduction. <br /> <br />Response <br /> <br />Concur. We agree that written policies and procedures are needed. These will be <br />clearly documented in our Planning Instructions by June 30, 1990, Responsible official <br />is the Assistant Commissioner - Resources Management. <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.