My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02678
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC02678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:20:30 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:30:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/15/1989
Author
Anne DeMarsay
Title
The Brownell Task Force and the Mexican Salinity Problem - A Narrative Chronology of Events - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />---nDZTSS <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />improve the quality of water going to Mexico; 2) appoint a <br />special representative to find a "permanent, definitive and <br />just" solution to the salinity problem and report to him by <br />the end of the year; and 3) submit a U.S.-approved proposal <br />to President Echeverria for consideration and approval. The <br />IBWC was directed to draw up and sign a Minute containing <br />this program.4 <br /> <br />,., <br /> <br />In preparation for the Mexican President's visit, the Office <br />of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Departments of State <br />and the Interior, briefed President Nixon on possible <br />diplomatic courses of action and short- and long-term <br />measures to reduce salinity levels of water delivered to <br />Mexico. In the short run, bypassing some portion of return <br />flows and replacing it with better quality water from <br />another source seemed the only practical means. Long-term <br />solutions fell into four categories: 1) continuing to <br />bypass Wellton-Mohawk return flows and substitution from <br />other sources (including "new water" from weather <br />modification and other augmentation technologies then under <br />study); 2) eliminating salt loading by totally or partially <br />shutting down the project; 3) desalting all or part of the <br />return flows; and 4) regulating salinity according to water <br />quality standards, restricting irrigation or requ1r1ng more <br />efficient on-farm water management practices where <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Before the Echeverria visit, the simplest and least <br />expensive course of action appeared to be to continue to <br />bypass, and substitute better quality water for, some <br />portion of the return flows, while the issue of an <br />acceptable salinity level was resolved diplomatically. <br />After the Wellton-Mohawk project reached salt balance, the <br />U.S could undertake more costly or controversial measures to <br />permanently maintain the negotiated salinity level. This <br />approach had several advantages: It would give Mexico an <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.