Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000543 <br /> <br />February 5, 1971 <br /> <br />3. Examine and evaluate each of the selected alternatives <br /> <br />to determine: (A) how tradeoffs effect water requirements <br /> <br />and their impacts with regard to the multiple planning <br /> <br />objectives; (B) if all necessary investments and actions <br /> <br />needed to assure full contribution by each alternative are <br /> <br />accounted for; and (C) that both the beneficial and adverse <br /> <br />effects of each alternative have been adequately evaluated. <br /> <br />4. Test the selected alternatives to determine their. acceptability <br /> <br />by the public and compatibility with existing legal and. insti- <br />tutional constraints. <br /> <br />5. Select a general plan from the alternatives. This general <br /> <br />plan will be selected from components of the alternatives based <br /> <br />on full consideration of how they meet the desired level of <br /> <br />economic activity, their compatibility with the multiple <br /> <br />planning objectives, and their acceptability by the general <br /> <br />public. <br /> <br />Study Limitations <br /> <br />Water Supply Planning <br />The natural supplies of water in the eleven Western States are reasonably <br /> <br />well known, consequently emphasis will be placed on study at a recon- <br /> <br />naissance level of the following water resources potentials in develop- <br /> <br />ment of alternative plans to provide the required water supplies in <br /> <br />terms of both quantity and quality. <br /> <br />IV-5 <br />