Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />/ <br />/ <br />, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />acre feet of Colorado's share of the river <br />annually flows out of the state without <br />having been used by any Colorado <br />appropriator (the actual amount of <br />Colorado's unused compact entitlement is <br />the subject of debate and is one of the <br />driving issues behind the CRDSS), <br /> <br />Nevertheless, the State Legislature <br />was persuaded to fund the start up of the <br />project in 1993 in the expectation that <br />work on the project would go forward <br />over a period of four years at an esti- <br />mated total cost of about $7,000,000 (this <br />figure may increase to $8,000,000) . <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board and the Division of Water <br />Resources (State Engineer's office) are <br />co-sponsoring the project and have <br />assembled a team to oversee the work. <br />The State's project management team is <br />lead by Ross Bethel, a principal with <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engi- <br />neers, Ross has extensive experience in <br />river simulation modeling for public and <br />private water users. State staff also <br />involved in CRDSS project management <br />includes Ray Alvarado, formerly with the <br />firm of Bishop Brogden and Associates <br />and now with the Colorado Water Conser- <br />vation Board, and Ray Bennett, formerly <br />with Boyle Engineering and now with the <br />Division of Water Resources. The <br />consulting team, headed by Riverside <br />Technology, Inc., and including <br />Colorado State University, also includes <br />another outstanding engineer, George <br />Fosha of W. W, Wheeler, George will be <br />the primary lead for the development of <br />the CRDSS river simulation models on <br />Colorado River tributaries within <br />Colorado, A technical advisory committee <br />of major Colorado River water users has <br />been assembled to help guide system <br />development. Technical subcommittees <br />include members of the Technical <br />Advisory Committee and other experts <br />from the consulting community, <br /> <br />The prestigious team the state has <br />assembled will go a long way to assuring <br />the credibility of the project. More <br />importantly, the commitment that team <br /> <br />001259 <br /> <br />has made to confer with and seek input <br />from the water users will assure that the <br />final work product will not be duplicative <br />of other work, but can provide an <br />extremely useful tool for all to use in the <br />analysis of Colorado River operations and <br />administration of the river. <br /> <br />Jack F, Ross <br /> <br />MAJOR CHANGES PROPOSED DURING <br />THIS SESSION OF THE COLORADO <br />LEGISLATURE CONCERNING WATER <br /> <br />To date, over a dozen pieces of <br />legislation have been introduced which <br />would impact water users either from a <br />water rights standpoint or from the <br />standpoint of environmental regulation. <br />Our readers should be aware that many <br />of these bills could have significant <br />impacts upon their rights if passed into <br />law. Because movement is quick at the <br />legislature, anyone concerned with the <br />particular areas mentioned in this <br />summary should contact us for additional <br />insights. Listed below are some of the <br />topics which are being debated in this <br />session of the legislature: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. A change in the priority of conditional <br />water rights if used for other than the <br />original intended purpose (SB54). <br /> <br />2. Changes to make the marketing of <br />water outside the state more feasible <br />(HBI006) , <br /> <br />3. State funding for construction of <br />certain public and private water <br />projects (SB29). <br /> <br />4, A proposal to modify the powers of <br />conservancy districts (HBI027). <br /> <br />5. A proposal to modify and restrict the <br />movement of water from one area of <br />the state to another which differs <br />from the current practice (SB95). <br /> <br />6. A proposal to modify the current <br />post-pumping requirements for wells <br /> <br />3 <br />