Laserfiche WebLink
<br />u02375 <br /> <br />7. The Procedures should as specifically as possible identify those <br />species and circumstances where: (a) stocking would be acceptable <br />on a routine basis; (b) stocking would be unacceptable; and <br />(c) stocking would be determined through a case-by-case evaluation <br />process. With respect to 7{c), above: <br /> <br />o Proposals to stock nonnative fishes will be founded on sound <br />biological evaluations and contain sufficient information to <br />allow for an objective and complete evaluation. <br /> <br />o Reviews, recommendations, and decisions related to a stocking <br />proposal will be based on biological considerations that will be <br />specifically identified. <br /> <br />o If an agency objects to a stocking proposal, that agency will <br />make a concerted effort to identify reasonable alternatives. <br /> <br />8. Habitat and biological communities have been significantly altered <br />in the Upper Basin. While it is difficult to fully assess and <br />quantify, the loss of habitat and the effects of nonnative species <br />are both responsible for the decline of the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes. It is not possible to definitively identify the <br />relative contribution that each of these factors had to the <br />endangerment of the fishes. In many cases, the proliferation of <br />nonnatives was made possible by habitat a1teration and the response <br />to the expectation of and demand for fishing to fulfill project <br />purposes for recreation. These factors should be considered in <br />recovery efforts for the endangered Colorado River fishes. <br /> <br />9. Nonnative fish stocking is an important component of sport fisheries <br />management and commercial aquaculture in the Upper Basin. The <br />establishment and maintenance of sport fisheries and aquaculture <br />activities that do not conflict with efforts to recover the <br />endangered Colorado River fishes is an important objective of both <br />the Service and the States. <br /> <br />10. The States have certain authorities for regulating/overseeing <br />aquaculture activities. The States intend to incorporate these <br />Procedures into their aquaculture permitting process. <br /> <br />II. STOCKING OF NONNATIVE AQUATIC SPECIES ALREADY OCCURRING IN THE UPPER <br />BASIN. <br /> <br />A. Table 1 identifies existing nonnative fish species that are <br />presently managed by stocking in the Upper Basin and the <br />locations/situations where these fish can be stocked on a routine <br />basis. Stocking in these location/situations is consistent with <br />recovery of the endangered Colorado River fishes. Appendix A <br />discusses the basis for concluding that stocking these species/ <br />locations/situations is consistent with recovery of the endangered <br />Colorado River fishes. <br /> <br />3 <br />