WSPC01522

• File Number: 8283.200
• Description: Colorado River Basin-Colorado River Computer Models-Colorado River Decision Support System
• State: CO
• Basin: Colorado Mainstem
• Water Division: 5
• Date: 4/1/1996
• Title: Boyle Contracts-Original-White River Basin Enhancement-Draft
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Operating Principles/Plan

APR-24-1996 15'54 FIU1 . RIU:RslDE'1ECI+lCl..OOYoINC

. ,_.",..' . . ~._._ '''''''-I".\:-J ~~\. "".' '..~
10' ..... ,~~. 'P.es'" . " ,

,
Delivetables:

:. ~orandum documenting the 10 administration number classes for the White
i River Basin.

2.05. ; Get water rights from database and determine flow weighted Arlmini<t:ration number
: through a DMI

,
Ol>jec~ve: Run watright to acce.~s the CROSS database. retrieve administration numbers.. and
calcullllf> the flow weighted administration numbers corresponding the administration number
classe.~ defined for the White River Basin. This task is to be accomplished through the following
specifli: work tasks:
I

Approach: ~ I ,r>
'",,\.I.- "",~,

~': 1. / Run watrijplt far the entire White River Basin using a commAnd file. The command
-ze:,-~ r file will include the explicitly modckd IltruCtures from Phase II as well as the
aggregated groups. The command file will also include the 10 administration number
classes as input.
.aE.WR: Document the determination of flow weighted ArlminilltratiOIl numbers far
the ba~n. the 1-2 page memo will include the basin sUIlllDlllY report generated by
watright. This document will be supplied to the State for review.
~ 3. .RTiWR' InC9lp~rnt"Sralemm~ts. 5~ ~~ =-_
\\. 't ~ r('.L3 \. €.= /' ~ In
l)Qlivembles:
. ,W-
i. A Jemorandum documenting the flow weighted adminiWdtion numbers far each
aggregated group of irrigation structures for the White River Basin.
\\. \~ !. STATEMOD dds and ddr input ftlcs that represent l()()% of the water use in the
ba.~in .

~.
,
,

2-~k\r0.
~'l'\O

2,06. : Assign return flow characteristics

Objec~ive: Assign and incorporate the return flow characteristics for each aggregated i
irriga~on sltUeture. This task is to be accompli.~hed through the following specific work tasks:

Apl'fljach:

,
^"'" i 1.
~.2.
I
~\--f-

,
i
i
0013

,

0-"- ~ 'i'

RTiWR: Assignthe,fhase II lag patlf>m to each aggregated structure.
MiWR: Determine return flow locations for each aggregated structure through
visunl inspection of the GIS map, default is one return flow location per
aggregated structure with the location being the next downstream node. It is
anticipated that no more than 5 aggregate structure~ will have return flow
locations other than the default.

~G - l/ ~H'>. >ir..J--

I