Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..APR-30-1996 12'29 FROM RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY,INC <br /> <br />: 4. <br /> <br />A.~~ <br />J <br /> <br />, <br />! 5. <br /> <br />, 6. <br /> <br />~ 7. <br /> <br />; 8. <br /> <br />[9. <br />: to. <br /> <br />Deliv~rables: <br /> <br />TO <br /> <br />13038664474555 P.08 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />State: Determi e the total M&I water use (depletion) from the Year II <br />consumptive u report for the White River Basin on an annual ba~is (12 values, <br />one for each m nth). <br />RTiWR: Calcu ate the difference between the explicitly modeled M&I depletion <br />and the total b in M&I depletion. <br />State: Detenni e three locations (nodes) within the White River Basin to <br />distribute the M depletion that was not modeled in Phase n. This will be done <br />by visually ins ting the CROSS municipal GIS coverage. <br />RTiWR: It is ticipated that Rti would be involved with determining M&I <br />structurelocati s. <br />State: Assign' estimated senior water right (senior relative to the White River <br />Basin) to each the three M&I nodes to reflect their priority use status in the <br />Basin. <br />RTiWR: Modi the STATEMOO input files to represent the three additional <br />M&I nodes. cause these nodes are modeled as depletive, assume an efficiency <br />of 100%, and a . ge capacity) <br />State: Docume t the location of the three additional aggregated M&I nodes and <br />the determinati of their watcr use time series in a 24 page memorandum. <br />RTiWR: Revie memorandum. <br />State: Incorpor te consultant comments. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />· State: A memorand m describing the aggregated M&I demand~, their associated <br />characteristics (dem nd, location, efficiency. return location). <br />,. RTiWR: STATEM 0 input files reflecting aggregated M&I nodes. <br /> <br />2.10, ! Aggregate reservoirs an stock ponds <br /> <br />Objcct;ivc: For the White Rver Basin create a map using the CROSS reservoir coverage <br />showi~8 all reservoirs. From is map, physically aggregate and model the reservoirs and stock <br />ponds hot explicitly modeled i Pha~e n. The aggregation of storage rights will be accomplished <br />throug~ watright, however, no istinction will be made within watright whether a storage right is <br />decreed for irrigation or non-i gation. The same 10 administration number classes as <br />detern#ned through the analysi of the irrigation diversion rights will be used to compute decree <br />weighted administration num s for the aggregated reservoirs. This task is to ~ accomplished <br />througjllhe following specific ork tasks: <br /> <br />Appro~ch: <br /> <br />\\~ <br />\,.il'':'' ); <br />o <br />~" <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />t- <br /> <br />State: From the ROSS Phase II reservoir coverage map, identify locations for a <br />maximum of thr aggregated reservoir nodes <br />RTiWR: It is as 'umed that RTi would cooperate with the State in determining 0 <br />location$ for the three aggregated reservoir nodes. <br /> <br />0026 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ h~~~ <br />t>~ <br />