My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC01410
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC01410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:11:39 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:46:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Colorado River-Colorado River Basin-Gunnison River General Publications-Corresp-Reports
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/14/1941
Author
F C Merriel
Title
Crested Butte Project-The Colorado River Water Conservation District-Project Investigations-Preliminary Report-Crested Butte Project-Gunnison County Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />j, ti01829 <br /> <br />... There is no record of diversions from Ohio Creek based on ac- <br /> <br /> <br />tual administration, but there was considerable shortage on Ohio Creek <br /> <br /> <br />in 1939 end 1940 and it seEmS probable that except in the best years <br /> <br /> <br />some Ohio Creok lands do not get enough water. Most of the junior Ohio <br /> <br /> <br />Creek decrees are in the upper valley, but lack of active administration <br /> <br /> <br />resul ts in most of the shortage actually appearing omong the senior <br /> <br /> <br />decrees in lower Ohio Creek valley, and along tributaries in the upper <br /> <br /> <br />valley. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A gaging station was installed by the Bureau of Reclamation <br />in April 1940, which measures the flow of Ohio Creek at Hinklo, just below <br />the mouth of Mill Creek. From the record of this station, it appears <br />doubtful that there was enough water to fully supply the ditches in upper <br />Ohio Creek valley, although in the absence of actual administration it <br />would be assumcd that these ditches took the wnter.they wanted. The re- <br />turn flow from irrigation of hoy meadows should be very high and during <br />the months of July and August (until water is shut off about August 10) <br />the flow of the stream at Hinkle should have been stabilized at about <br />the quantity of water actually available in the upper valley. If thi s <br />is true for the 1940 record, then there was a very considerable shortage <br />in the upper valley as well as below Hinkle. The record for the month <br />of August shows no decided gain at Hinkle such as should follow the end <br />of irrigation in the upper valley, until August 20. This gain was soon <br />drained away and the record seEmS to show that for the last 10 days of <br />July and most 01' August there was only available a maximum of )1 second- <br />feet end an average 01' 20 second-feet for the whole Ohio Creek valley. <br />The shortage in 1940 was calculated (for the Ohio Creek lands) <br />on the basis that the recorded runoff at Hinkle subtracted from total of <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />-22- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.