Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Subtask 3- Estimate Other Consumptive Use <br />3.1 Based on the reservoir evaporation data developed by Division 4 for the AspinaIl Unit and <br />Taylor Park Reservoirs and other consumptive uses developed for the CROSS Phase II <br />Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, estimate other uses CU for the Gunnison River <br />Basin upstream of the Aspinall Unit between Crystal and Morrow Point, Morrow Point <br />and Blue Mesa, and upstream of Blue Mesa, Note; stock ponds and livestock use wiIl be <br />excluded from this summary since water rights are not typically assigned to these uses, <br />3,2 In cooperation with the Division Engineer, identify the major components contributing to <br />the other uses, <br />3.3 Identify the active structures and water rights associated with the major identified other <br />users, <br />3.4 Similar to Subtask 1.4 characterize (average monthly) the diversions of the Other Uses <br />structures. <br />3.5 Prepare a PC-based spreadsheet (Excel), same as in section 2.5) that will aIlow one to <br />enter an administrative number and obtain an estimate of the other uses consumptive use <br />senior and junior to that administrative number. <br />3.6 Operate the spreadsheet with the same administration dates used in 1.9 and summarize <br />results in a table, <br /> <br />Subtask 4 - Documentation <br />4,1 Prepare six (6) copies of a draft memorandum summanzmg the analysis and results <br />performed in subtasks 1 through 3. Include: <br />a) a table and a plot summarizing the average annual CU that occurs above the <br />Aspinall Unit between Crystal and Morrow Point, Morrow Point and Blue Mesa, <br />and upstream of Blue Mesa for agricultural, M&I, other uses, for each CD group <br />presented in Task 1.9, This should be considered preliminary since the user may <br />wish to improve the analysis through refinement of the input data, <br />b) discussion of areas of potential enhancements or limitations that might include a <br />new approach to assign climate parameters rather than the countylHUC approach, <br />a less regional approach to assign maximum system efficiency, additional diversion <br />record coding, incorporating caIl estimates, etc. <br />c) discuss and contrast the CU estimates and approach developed herein for potential <br />use in court to the estimates developed for planning purposes by the Phase II <br />CROSS analysis, and the Phase IlIa StateMod analysis, Areas of discussion are <br />expected to include variable versus average monthly efficiency, historic versus <br />simulated diversions, soil moisture accounting, refinement of basic data, etc, <br />d) a basic description of the basic process and tools employed in the analysis so that <br />the procedure could be applied by local water users and administrators. <br /> <br />4,2 Finalize the draft documentation (subtask 4,1) with State and other reviewer comments, <br />Provide six (6) hard copies and one in MS Word format. <br /> <br />\.f5\)~ <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />,. <br />