Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,}.(:.. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <"'I,r-,7 ~"'. .' <br /> <br />-. <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BEFORE THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL <br />DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF <br /> <br />""!l'n'~ QIJi\Hr'() <br />APR~ 6198)j <br />~\;S'tdN'I";MI"';,I"'1'l <br />COLORADO <br /> <br />RE: COLORADO RIVER SALINITY STANDARDS, PROPOSED REGULATORY REVISIONS <br />TO SECTION 3.9.5, ARTICLE 3, WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OF THE. <br />RULES, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDELINES OF THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL <br />CONNISSION <br /> <br />CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS' PREHEARING STATENENT <br /> <br />CONES NOW the City of Colorado Springs, by and through its attor- <br /> <br />neys, James G. Colvin II, City Attorney and Michael J. Heydt, Deputy <br /> <br />City Attorney, and submits its Prehearing Statement: <br /> <br />1. A summary statement of the position of the party on the issues <br /> <br />that are subject of the hearings and the action thereon the Commission <br /> <br />should take. <br /> <br />The City of Colorado Springs intends to present testimony, as <br /> <br />evidenced by its prehearing Statement, which is attached to this <br /> <br />Application for Party Status. In summary, it is the position of the <br /> <br />City of Colorado Springs that salinity control on the Colorado River <br /> <br />should be a basin-wide approach and the only responsible party for that <br /> <br />control should be the U.S. Government. The basis for this position is <br /> <br />that the salinity controls on the Colorado River have been developed as <br /> <br />a result of the Treaty with Mexico along with the various Minutes <br /> <br />thereto. The several States and various local governments have not had <br /> <br />an opportunity to participate in the determination of. whether or not <br /> <br />salinity stand;1rds should or should Hut be implemented. Therefore, the <br /> <br />1492 <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br />4/23/82h <br />