Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001418 <br /> <br />-12- <br /> <br />10. Depletions in state of Colorado (Cont'd)1 <br /> <br />as much. or 3.680.000 acre feet per year during the drouth cycle,- <br />a figure comparable with tr.e 3.425.000 acre feet of the Report <br />(after correction as above oul; lined). Expressed in another way. <br />if the depletions average 3.425.000 acre feet in the clrouth cyc Ie <br />year. per Report, then in a normal year they would average <br />() 4.a:l0.000 acre feet. . a figure comparable with tll3 4,600,000 acre <br />feet estimated by this office. <br /> <br />. Present and potential depletions in the Upper Basin. averaging <br />6.065.000 acre feet in a drouth cyc Ie year. upon the same assump- <br />tion. would average 7.580.000 acre feet al.nually in a normal year. <br />In other words. the Bureau Report contemplates that beneficial con- <br />sumptive use in the Upper Basin will approximate 7.500.000 acre <br />feet al1llually. as provided in the Colorado River Compact. However. <br />if the Compact be interpreted to limit total depletions in the <br />Upper Basin to 7,500.000 acre feet annually. then the projects <br />described in the Report will bring the total depletions. including <br />reservoir losses. to 6.896.000 acre feet in a drouth cycle year. <br />and to 8,620.000 acre feet in a normal year. Under such an inter- <br />pretation the described projects would exceed allowable depletions <br />and would in part become impossible of attainment. <br /> <br />11. Power Productionl <br /> <br />The Report describes 35 potential hydro-electric power plants in <br />the Colorado River Basin. with a total installed capaoity of more than <br />3.5CXl.000 EVI. Added to present capacities. principally at Boulder Dam. the <br />total in the Colorado River Basin will ultimately e::ceed 5.000.000 KVI. <br /> <br />Seven of the new plants located in the Lower Basin. mostly on the <br />main stream. would have a total installed capacity of 1.948.000 KW.. and <br />would produce ten-billion kilowatt-hours a year. This would satisfy all ex- <br />pected future demands until 1961. at which time. aocording to the a,eport. <br />the growing po~~r market is expected to exceed the power supply. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The 28 power plants in the Upper Basin. mostly on tributary streams. <br />would have an installed capacity of 1.695.000 KVI., and an annual output of <br />nine-billion kilowatt-hours a year. The Report comments that this is more <br />than the anticipated requirements for power in the Uf'per Basin, including <br />pumping of irrigation v;ater. and would leave some for transmission to adja- <br />oent areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />NOTE (16)1 Not included in the Report are the similarly large power possi- <br />bilities attaching to the Eastern Slope features of the Colorado- <br />Big Thompson. Blue-South platte. and Gunnison-Arkansas projects, <br />which will come into competition with plants in the Upper Colo- <br />rado River Basin for the power markets of adjacent areas. such <br />as Denver and pueblo. Hhile the amount of potential power to be <br />generated on the Eastern slope might be estimated. with perhaps <br />the same accuracy as the estimates contained in the Report. they <br />