My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00886
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:07:58 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:24:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111
Description
Colorado River Basin-Water Projects-Central Utah Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/22/1988
Author
Ival Goslin
Title
Central Utah Project-Ceiling Increase Legislation-Comments on HR 3408 and S 1737
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 8 - <br /> <br />determines the Central Utah Project to be substantially com- <br />plete, whichever occurs later. The Commission would have five <br />members, who would be appointed by the President from rec- <br />ommended citizens of Utah. The members of the Commission and <br />its director would be paid on the daily rate of the Federal <br />salary schedule as GS-l5 employees. Heads of Federal agencies <br />would be authorized to detail, on a reimbursable basis, <br />personnel to aid the Commission. The Commission would ~ auth- <br />orized to use the U.S. mails in the same manner as other depart- <br />ments and agencies of the United States. The Attorney General <br />of the U.S. would represent the Commission in litigation to <br />ensure the performance of contracts. <br /> <br />1. The Commission would be a Federal commission <br />composed solely of Utah citizens. It would have a number <br />of close ties to the Federal government, including having <br />the U.S. Attorney General as a legal representative. It <br />is extremely doubtful that Colorado and the other Upper <br />Basin States would condone having a Federal commission look- <br />ing down their throats from a throne in Utah. Such a <br />practice is characteristic of Federal commissions that do <br />not have specific limitations placed on them. <br /> <br />2. The use of the U.S. mails in the same manner <br />as other Federal agencies appears to give an unfair advantage <br />to one State, and certdinly not in conformity with the usual <br />practices of the Federal Postal Service. <br /> <br />J. The Attorney General of the United States <br />in representing a commission of the type proposed could <br />find himself with serious conflicts of interest because he <br />also represents Indian Tribes and other Federal agencies <br />that deal with land and related water resources. <br /> <br />2262 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.