My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00745
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00745
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:06:48 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:20:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8283.200
Description
Colorado River Basin-Colorado River Computer Models-Colorado River Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/21/1996
Author
Meg Frantz
Title
Yampa Enhancement-Memorandum-October 17 Progress Meeting Minutes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.0.00848 . <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />File <br /> <br />October 21, 1996 <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Meg Frantz <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />OCT 28 1996 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />October 17, 1996 Progress Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Attendees: <br /> <br />Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board <br /> <br />· Ray Bennett, SED <br />· Ray Alvarado, CWCB <br />· Roger Sonnichsen, Boyle <br />· Meg Frantz, Boyle <br /> <br />, I <br />. I <br />. _I_)__~ I <br />:.C.LL-- __1- I <br />- , ,~ <br /> <br />ill. ~..~ ," :\ <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The meeting was held at Boyle's office with the above-listed people in attendance. Objective was to <br />review progress with the Yampa River basin model and line out approach on subtasks currently being <br />worked on. Please contact Meg Frantz is you believe the following to be incorrect. <br /> <br />Task 3.01 - Instream Flow Modifications <br /> <br />Meg passed out the draft memorandum for Task 3.01. The memo reflects that DMI's were used to <br />create model input files to the extent they were used in Phase 2, or (in the case of the .dds file) to the <br />extent it was practical to do so, Specifically, <br /> <br />· makenet was used to create a network diagram and ,rin file <br /> <br />· watright was used to create .ifr and .ifs files; these files were hand-edited to the extent that they <br />were edited in the Phase 2 model, and documentation describing the edits was added to the files. <br /> <br />· the .if a file was created by editing the Phase 2 .if a file, which appears to have been created <br />manually <br /> <br />· return flow nodes in the Phase 2 .dds file were modified through the gui to avoid having to run <br />demandts to create a file equivalent to the Phase 2 .dds file with respect to constrained demand. <br /> <br />Under both the historical and calculated demand scenarios, the change in instream flow configuration <br />made no change to diversions. The instrearri flow rights in the enhanced model control the same or <br />slightly smaller amounts of water when compared to the Phase 2 model. <br /> <br />Ray Alvarado suggested that the memo should interpret Exhibits 2 and 4 in more detail because the <br />printout is not self evident. <br /> <br />BO'rlLE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.