My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00578
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC00578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 7:49:42 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:15:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8045
Description
Section D General Studies-Federal Projects-General
Date
12/1/1979
Title
Moon Lake Power Plant Project-Reports 1979-80-Position Statement on the Rangely Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />AlThough the Moo~ lake-Staley Mine Pipeline might obtain a rather <br /> <br />substantial yield under its senior right by pre-empting the Rangefy <br /> <br />Project, the rates at which the pipeline cpuld divert would be <br /> <br />quite variable, particularly with its ful I demand of 125.2 cfs. <br /> <br />Notwithstanding the question whether diversions by the Moon lake- <br /> <br />Staley Mine Pipeline under its direct diversion decree could be' <br /> <br />legally stored for'subsequent use, a storage facility would be <br /> <br />required to provide a firm continuous supply from the potential <br /> <br />yield of this right. We estimate that a reservoir having a live <br /> <br />storage capacity of about 60,000 AF would be necessary to regulate <br /> <br />the maximum yield obtainable by the pipeline under its 125.2 cfs <br /> <br />senior right and would provide a continuous constant rate of supply <br /> <br />of about 105 cfs. To provide a constant 30 cfs supply, a storage <br /> <br />faci lity of over 3,200 AF capacity would be required, and The <br /> <br />pipeline would have to be capable of diverting considerably more <br /> <br />than 30 cfs during periods of refi Iling of the ca~ry-over supply. <br />If storage were not provided:" <br /> <br />I. The right would obtain no supplies abOUT 3 percent <br /> <br />of the time regardless of its operating capacity; <br /> <br />2. If operated at its ful I entitlement of /25.2 cfs~ <br /> <br />it would only be able to divert a portion of this <br /> <br />amount about 32 percent of the time; and <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />If operated at a capacity of 30 cfs, it would only <br /> <br />0251 <br /> <br />01) <br />..... (" <br />. \ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.