Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Senior AbsoluTe Smal I RighTs NOT Included in The CORSIM II <br />Data Base Which Have Been Perfected Since CORSIM I I DevelopmenT: <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />I. Polfer DiTch and Pipeline <br /> <br />0.25 cfs <br /> <br />2. W & P Spring <br /> <br />0.5 cis <br /> <br />3. MarcoTt Ditch, 4Th Enlargement <br /> <br />0.64 cfs <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The ~ Lake-Staley ~ Pi~'eline as decreed could pre-empT the <br /> <br />Rangely Project up to the amount of its original right for 125.2 cfs. <br /> <br />If used as proposed for cool ing purposes in a thermal power plant, <br /> <br />125 cfs of these diversions would be returned to the White River and <br /> <br />the remaining 0.2 cfs would be lost by evaporation. Under the current <br /> <br />EPA regulations, there is a question whether "once-through" use of The <br /> <br />Moon Lake-Staley Mine Pipeline diversions for cooling purposes would <br /> <br />be al lowed. If such a use were not permiTtee, a closed cooling system <br /> <br />would have to b~employed in ~~ich the cooling wa~er would be recycled. <br /> <br /> <br />In this event, atter initial fil I ing of the system, the only diversions <br /> <br />by The "'.oon Lake-Stal ey Mine ? i pe line wou I d be make-up wat-er to rep I ace <br /> <br />evaporation losses. This type .of operation would have little, if any, <br /> <br />effect on The potential yield of the Rangely Project. <br /> <br />It is also possible that The cooling requirements may be considerably <br /> <br />less Than the 125.2 cfs enTitlement of the ~~n Lake-Staley Mine <br /> <br />Pipeline senior right, perhaps as, lit-tie as 30 CTS. Accordingly, the <br /> <br />0255, <br /> <br />\ <br />d' <br />/\ .J <br />....1 \_, <br />