My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00146
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:48:16 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:58:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Division 2
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/28/1995
Title
Materials of Interest - Greenback Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan - Final Greenback Cutthroat Trout Recovery Team Submission - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOZJ35 <br /> <br />montane stream in 1967 pricr to restocking with 50 pure greenback cutthroat <br />trout, which later established a reprcducing population. However,-in 1973, <br />two brook trout were found above the barrier, and by 1977, electrofishing for <br />more than one mile above the barrier produced only brock trout (Behnke 1976, <br />1979). <br /> <br />The mechanism by which brook trout displace greenbacks is not thoroughly <br />understood. However, in colder habitats, it probably includes an advantage <br />gained through a one year earlier sexual maturation by brook trout and through <br />larger brook trout young-of-the-year (YOY). Brook trout spawn in the fall. <br />Their fry emerge from the redds much earlier in the year than do the spring <br />spawning greenbacks, and the YOY brook trout can be 30 mm longer than YOY <br />greenbacks by their first October. In Hidden Valley Creek, Rocky Mountain <br />National Park (RMNP), YOY brook trout (65 mm) and YOY greenbacks (35 mm) are <br />usually found in the shallow stream habitat by October and appear to compete <br />for food and space during winter minimum flows. Fausch and Cummings (1986), <br />found brook trout juveniles to occupy more energetically favorable positions <br />than greenbacks in stream habitats when the two were fcund in sympatry within <br />Hidden Valley Creek, RMNP, and indicated that brook trcut juveniles were <br />dominant over juvenile greenbacks (probably due to their larger size). <br />However, Fausch and CUmmings found aggression between adult (>150 mm) brook <br />trout and greenbacks to be minimal. <br /> <br />Although brcok trout dominate greenbacks and represent 60%-90% of the fish <br />population in Black Hollow and Hidden Valle~ CreekS, greenback hybrids and <br />Colorado River cutthroats have successfully co-existed for over 40 years <br />and/or dominate (50% to 90% of fish numbers) over brook trout within Lake-of- <br />Glass, Thunder Lake and Willow Creek, Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP). <br />Greenbacks have also demonstrated that they can invade dense brook trout <br />populations in some circumstances, such as in the North Fork of the Big <br />Thompson River. Greenbacks were introduced into a fishless habitat above an <br />un-named falls on the upper North Fork of the Big Thompson River, RMNP in <br />1970, and established a reproducing population. By 1986, greenbacks had <br />drifted downstream, and represented l4.S percent of the fish over 50 mm in <br />length in the stream section from Lost Falls to the unnamed falls. In this <br />section, brook trout did not exceed 280 mm in length, though greenbacks <br />reached 304 mm. <br /> <br />Arkansas River greenbacks in Lytle Pond (U.S. Army, Ft. Carson) succeSSfully <br />coexist with brook trout, with brook trout numbers declining. However, <br />spawning habitat at Lytle pond is less favorable in the fall than in the <br />spring, and may provide greenbacks with a competitive advantage over brook <br />trout at this lccation. <br /> <br />Brown trout. Wang (1989) observed the behavior and competition of <br />yearling South Platte greenbacks and brown trcut in an indoor stream aquarium. <br />Brown trout were found to be more aggressive than equal-sized greenbacks. <br />Brown trout even out competed greenbacks that were 1.27 times longer and 1.69 <br />times heavier. Slow current combined with dim light significantly increased <br />attack frequency of brown ~rout on greenbacks. Few greenback restoration <br />projects involve former--brown trout habitat. However, the dominance of brown <br />trout over greenbacks (as indicated by Wang's study) is evident in Gecrge and <br />cornelius Creeks, where brown trout appear to be displacing greenbacks (Steve <br />puttmann, colorado Division of Wildlife, pers. comm., 1991). <br /> <br />Anoler Harvest. The removal of adult greenbacks by anglers, may have had a <br />negative impact upon greenbacks, especially when exotic salmonids were <br />present. Cutthroat trout are more easily caught than other species. Removal <br />of the older, larger greenbacks might favor brook trout, which reproduce at <br />smaller sizes and younger ages. Changes in fishing regulations in effect <br />since 1982 within RMNP that limited the harvest of non-native cutthroats and <br />Colorado River cutthroat to two fish over 250 mm, and catch-and-release only <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.