My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC00040
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSPC00040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:47:57 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 1:54:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/28/1995
Title
Functional Requirements Document for PRSYM - CRSS Modeling of Total Dissolved Solids - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />OuQ57St <br /> <br />3.0- Application of CRSS methods in PRSYM <br /> <br />\~ <br /> <br />It appears that the use of the !ON;-fT card was tn hAUAr "'rrrm<imate the distribution <br />of salt loadin~ a season. t remains a mystery as to why tons were used <br />r ~ <br />Instead of mg/L and why the pickup of these stations is applied directly to the river. In <br />any case, examination of the code, manuals, and data reveals that it should make no <br />difference to the annual salt loading. <br /> <br />The table on the next page shows that computing an equivalent monthly mg/L loading <br />from the tons distribution and using it to calculate the monthly salt loading produces <br />the same annual salt loading as calculated using the input mg/L. Therefore, it is <br />feasible to calculate an equivalent monthly mg/L using the existing monthly tons <br />distribution. This can be done in the input OM!. The constant monthly salt loading <br />data can be mapped directly into a monthly salt pickup time-series. <br /> <br />It may possible to ignore the case of only applying TONPCT if the percent shortage is <br />less than 75 percent. Shortages occur infrequently in CRSS and it is rjpt known ~hat <br />the history is behind tile 75 perceot figure. It may also be feasible to apply the <br />75 percent threshold to all return flows. <br /> <br />In addition, it should not matter if salt loading is done to a return flow or to the river. <br />Therefore, it makes sense to be consistent and always apply loading via return flows <br />on the AggOiversion object or element. This also reduces the number of slots <br />required. These steps will simplify PRSYM calculations. The input OMI can also take <br />care of mapping recycled variables to appropriate PRSYM objects and slots. <br /> <br />Also for the sake of consistency, all diversions should inherent their quality from the <br />point of diversion. For reservoirs, the diversion quality will always be equal to the <br />reservoir quality. For reaches, if the user has provided a diversion quality, it will be <br />used, otherwise, the diversion quality will be set equal to the reach quality. <br /> <br />The TOS methods will recycle existing water quality variables when it is possible to do <br />so without introducing confusion. In the case of confluences, it should be possible to <br />use the existing method and slots by excluding the use of the temperature <br />parameters. ..-, \ <br />~L' <br />These methods wil~eplicate CRSS output except for error messages and some of <br />the informational messages. An output OMI can De developed for formatted output. <br /> <br />A list of slots to support these methods is provided in Appendix B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.