Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />type(s) of analyses . performed to make the decisiora-hat types of presentation <br />graphics/reports are generated throughout the decision making process, how are the decisions <br />communicated, and what type of hardware/software is used throughout the decision making <br />process. <br /> <br />Next, alternative designs are fonnulated. Based on the problem descriptions and <br />definition of system needs, a variety of decision support system architectures is formulated. <br />The heart of the designs includes model-base management, data analysis, database <br />management, user interface management and communications. In formulating the alternative <br />designs, the problem descriptions are continuously referenced to determine if the proposed <br />design is feasible in addressing the problems. Adjustments are made to the design <br />accordingly. Once the designs are specified, cost estimates for implementation of the system <br />are made. The estimates may include the cost of hardware, third pany software, <br />communications facilities, and programming staff. <br /> <br />TASK 1: DEFINITION OF NEEDS (NEEDS AJ.'l'ALYSIS) <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />.-- <br />The first step in formulating CRDSS alternatives is the development of a prioritized <br />list of CRDSS needs. The needs of the system may be defined as the set of problems the <br />CRDSS must be capable of addressing. The needs analysis will be the beginning of the <br />problem-centered design/cognitive walk-tl1rough procedure. <br /> <br />Adminim-ation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The needs analysis will be led by the CADSWES component of the team. with <br />extensive interaction with the potential users of CRDSS, the Project Management Team, and <br />public involvement support from Dames &. Moore. <br /> <br />Detailed Work Plan <br /> <br />Immediately upon awarding the contract, a representative group of potential CRDSS <br />system users (hereinafter referred to as users) wiil be identified by the CRDSS Advisory <br />Committee, and arrangements will be made for problem-centered design meetings at the <br />earliest date. The users should represent a diverse set of water interests including <br />agricultural, water quality, municipal, industrial, recreational, fisheries. etc. from both the <br />western slope and the front range who have interests specifically in the CRDSS. In a series <br />of sessions, the project team will work with the CRDSS user group using the <br />problem-centered design/cognitive walk-through methodology. We will merge CADSWES <br />problem-centered design/cognitive approach with Dames & Moore's facilitation skills and <br />consensus building techniques. Through these sessions the major problems as perceived by <br />the users will be recorded. Descriptions of the types of decisions that the CRDSS needs to <br />support and the tasks involved in reaching those decisions will be documented. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The preliminary needs analysis performed by the CRDSS project management team <br />will be thoroughly reviewed by the team. Issues and problems relating to interstate compact <br />policy analysis, Colorado water resource management, and Colorado water rights <br /> <br />':2- <br />