Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'& <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ann Branscomb stated that ~he understands both sides of the <br />dilemma, but felt she would like to have the names and addresses of <br />stockholders available without t~e number of shares owned by each. <br />Or would it be possible tv rele~se names wi~ the option to have <br />your name removed from the list for those who agree with the Board? <br /> <br />Carol Hellwig wondered if certain specifications were met, <br />would it b~ possibl~ to release this information. <br /> <br />RiChard in.formed the stockhc;:lld.ers that there is nothing in the <br />By-Laws noting this information has to go to other stockholders. . <br />It's entirely up to the ~oard., but at this meeting, is willing to <br />have a vote and leave it to the stockholders. Bert Nelson also <br />mentioned that good reasoning for wanting the stockholders list was <br />never given by the party in.question. <br /> <br />A question was raised by Ta}lIara Nauman. She asked for a list <br />or people on a specific ditch for the cleaning of the ditch. Was <br />this available? <br /> <br />Don Getman thanked the Boatd for their stance a~rt felt that <br />people wanting names of people ~n specific ditches was a totally <br />different ~tter. <br /> <br />Richard felt the Actinq Secretary could qiVA out the namas of <br />the heads of the ditches, but that was all. <br /> <br />:'1fOTION: <br />[tt\ . <br />~ Ii\" <br />~1'0 . ~,,~) , <br />.~- ****NOTE** One stockholdar vote~ against the motion. <br /> <br />* MOTION: By Leroy ~~hlaqel to app~ove Soard actions for 199J. <br />Second by Bill Boehm. <br />MO'1'TON CARRIED. <br /> <br />By Ron Sutherland to st~nd by Boards decision <br />requests for stockholde~ information. <br />Second by Donald Getman. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />to deny <br /> <br />RICK S'l'F.T,Y.MAClC - FINANCIAL REI"On~ <br /> <br />The financial situation of the Ditch Co. was r~poIted by RiCk <br />Stellmack. He also explained the Great Colorado Payback since the <br />Ditch Co. bad unclaimed money ~at had to b~ sent to the ~tate. <br />Per review of year end financia:l statements by Lambert, Jensen, <br />Burcham and Associates, Left Hand Ditch co. experienced an <br />operating loss of $6,943.00. some concern ~as noted regarding <br />future revenues fQ~ financit~ the spillway project. <br /> <br />v <br />