Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />lower quality Cabin Reservoir water with that from Krnzen Springs; this <br />increases the Town of Palisade's treatment costs. There is no guarantee that <br />Town water can continue to deliver water to Ute, however, allowance will be <br />made in the pipeline for these flows at this time. <br /> <br />Emergen!;)' Operations Ute Water has also indicated an interest in possibly <br />utilizing the Cottonwood Creek pipeline to provide short term peak flows when <br />normal sources of water are cut off. One reason for this need is that it may <br />be necessary to shut down the Plateau Creek pipeline source during the <br />reconstruction in 1998. Also, there is danger to both of its supplies during <br />flood years; in case of a complete shutdown, an access to Palisade water for <br />emergencies is a possible option. Although not all situations requiring peak <br />flows are emergencies, the term 'Emergency Operation' will be used for <br />simplicity to describe peak flow applications. <br /> <br />Ute Water has mentioned two possible scenarios for peak flows: a maximum of <br />10 mgd from the Palisade water plant for short periods of time, and 4 mgd as <br />supplemental water for longer periods. This would obviously require a much <br />larger pipeline. Since Palisade must be able to provide this water on demand, <br />but it is used infrequently, a special rate schedule would have to be established <br />to help pay back extra costs for this. <br /> <br />4. Conclusions: Palisade/Ute Water N.-Is At the time of this report, discussions <br />have been held with Ute Water on their near and long range water <br />requirements. However, Ute Water had not made any definitive proposal to <br />the Town of Palisade to confirm the need for peak flows, nor had there been <br />any discussions on potential cost sharing. Since Pali~de i~ the sole loan <br />applicant and is under a deadline to move forward with the prQject, the <br />pipeline analysis will foclls on a pipeline for nonnal operation.~ only, i.e., <br />to provide maximum day demands for the Town of Pali~de, plus flows <br />which have historicallY been provided to Ute Water and any additional <br />flows which the overall system is capahle of handling, This would not <br />preclude Ute Water from contracting with the Town at a later date prior to <br />design to request an expansion of the pipeline size. However, Ute Water <br />would be solely responsible for that additional cost. <br /> <br />5. 'Carriage Water' to Ralance SllPP1y and Demand <br /> <br />Another factor that should be considered in sizing the pipe is that when flow is <br />controlled at the upstream end (the non-pressure pipe), it is difficult to exactly <br />balance supply and demand. To compensate for this, it has been traditional <br />for Palisade to release more water than needed and dump any excess water into <br />Rapid Creek at a blow-off above the WTP. This water is used by downstream <br />residents, which have junior water rights to Palisade's. This water is referred <br />to herein as 'carriage water'. <br /> <br />V-8 <br />