Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table ill-6 <br />Future PQpulation in Water Service Area <br /> <br />Yl:ar <br /> <br />Pqpulation <br /> <br />2000 <br />2005 <br />2010 <br />2015 <br />2020 <br />2025 <br /> <br />3785 <br />4160 <br />4580 <br />5040 <br />5544 <br />6098 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Future Water Use <br /> <br />a. General. Normally, future water demand is based in historical use data. <br />However, the previous section indicated that Palisade water use is high <br />(compared to other similar communities) and a water conservation <br />program which reduces per capita consumption may be worth <br />investigating. For comparison, future water demand with and without a <br />water conservation program were estimated. <br /> <br />b. Future Water Usage Without Water Conservation. For calculating future <br />water use based on existing use, the following values will be applied: <br />average annual (250 gpd), Maximum Day (600 gpcd). Future water <br />usage on an annual and seasonal basis for 5-year time increments is <br />estimated to be as follows: <br /> <br />Table ill-7A <br />Future Pqpulation E(pIivalent & Water Demand <br />Without Water Conservation <br /> <br />Yl:ar <br />2000 <br />2005 <br />2010 <br />2015 <br />2020 <br />2025 <br /> <br />Equivalent <br />Population <br />3785 <br />4160 <br />4580 <br />5040 <br />5544 <br />6098 <br /> <br />Max.D::ty <br />(MGl <br />2.27 <br />2.50 <br />2.75 <br />3.02 <br />3.32 <br />3.66 <br /> <br />Annual Use <br />(MGl !.AE) <br />345.4 1059 <br />379.6 1164 <br />417.9 1282 <br />459.9 1411 <br />505.9 1552 <br />556.4 1707 <br /> <br />c. Future Water Use With Water Conservation. The decrease in water use <br />with a water conservation program is very difficult to predict. For <br />purposes of this report, a 12 % decrease in water use was assumed as <br />the maximum that could realistically be achieved. This would result in <br /> <br />ill-I 0 <br />