My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC00141
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
PROJC00141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2010 10:41:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:03:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150135
Contractor Name
Silt Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Bill Number
MC3
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5. Since there was no quantitative information available on which to base an estimate of <br />the amount of grout which would be required, the estimate of the amount of grout <br />required was conservatively made. GTOut takes typically average 1 to 2 sacks per foot <br />when grouting consolidated formations. The above cost estimate is based on an <br />assumed grouting rate of 2 sacks per foot. However, the actual takes must be expected <br />to vary considerably from this presumptive estimate. <br /> <br />6. Without the benefit ofgeoteclmical information, including field permeability tests, it is <br />impossible to predict with any confidence the extent of seepage zones which will <br />require grouting. You suggested that the length of dam along the crest that would <br />require grouting would be about 100 feet. Because of the limited information <br />available, we doubled that in our estimate for the sake of conservatism. Obviously, if <br />the amount of grouting required is decreased, the costs will be reduced roughly <br />proportionally. For example, if the length of grout curtain is only 100 feet, the costs <br />would be cut approximately in half. <br /> <br />7. We anticipate that the grouting process will consist of the following: <br /> <br />a. Drill primary grout holes spaced 20 feet apart using hollow stem auger methods in <br />the embankment and coring in the sandstone. <br /> <br />b. Pe1form permeability testing in the sandstone with packers. <br /> <br />c. Pump grout in 5 to 10 foot stages at appropriate pressures using packers. <br /> <br />d. If the stage takes significant grout, continue injecting low viscosity grout until it is <br />estimated that the travel distance has reached at least 10 to 20 feet. Slowly increase <br />the grout viscosity until grout takes stop. <br /> <br />e. Drill and grout secondary holes intermediate between the primary holes if pervious <br />zones are indicated by the primary hole grout takes. <br /> <br />f. If there are indications that the surface dril1ing and grouting may not have <br />intercepted the seepage aquifer permeable zones, drill and grout short holes along the <br />grout curtain alignment from inside the outlet tunnel to close the grout curtain. <br /> <br />8. Because of the potential for wide variations in the actual fina\ scope of work as <br />discussed above we have included a 25 percent contingency factor in the cost estimate. <br /> <br />9. Grouting should be performed during maximum reservoir drawdown for safety <br />considerations and to minimize the potential for grout to be carried away by seepage <br />flows. <br /> <br />10. Western Engineers has grouting capabilities. The above cost estimate is based on the <br />costs we would expect to incur if we performed the scope of work described above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.