My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC00141
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
PROJC00141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2010 10:41:02 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:03:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150135
Contractor Name
Silt Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Bill Number
MC3
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />piping and decreased embankment stability resulting from greater pore <br />pressures. <br /> <br />11. The objective of any grouting scheme should be to create a curtain which will <br />act as a barrier to seepage beyond a certain longitudinal limit (a line parallel to <br />the dam axis) such as the upstream crest of the dam. A program of drilling and <br />grouting through the embankment using either chemical or cement grout should <br />be effective in significantly reducing seepage flows and pressures through the <br />bedrock. The following considerations should be made in evaluating the <br />potential use of a grouting program: <br /> <br />. Grouting generally has a significant positive effect on significantly reducing <br />seepage flows. However, often a grout program will not block 100 percent of <br />the seepage pathways. <br /> <br />. By grouting along a line parallel to the dam axis as far upstream as feasible, <br />the risks previously discussed related to exclusive outlet tunnel grouting are <br />minimized or eliminated. Such a grouting scheme, if cautiously formulated to <br />minimize the potential for hydraulic fracturing, can only produce beneficial <br />results. Any pore pressure increases resulting from blocking existing seepage <br />paths will occur upstream from the grout curtain (in the area of the upstream <br />embankment and fOlUldation) where pore pressure increases are not detrimental. <br />Any blockage of seepage paths will reduce pore pressures in the areas <br />downstream from the curtain. Completion of the curtain will likely involve some <br />grouting from inside of the outlet tunnel to close the curtain along its line in the <br />vicinity of the outlet. <br /> <br />. Cement grouting would be most effective if the reservoir level was drawn <br />down below the level at which significant seepage. OthetWise, some of the <br />grout would likely be lost to flowing subsurface water. If the grouting is to be <br />petformed without drawdown of the reservoir, chemical grouts might be <br />necessary which would significantly increase the cost of a grouting program. <br /> <br />. As previously discussed for the lining option, further field investigations <br />would provide valuable information which could be used in designing a grouting <br />program. <br /> <br />. If, as indicated by the Martin and Wood report, there are significant soluble <br />materials filling joints and other openings, the effectiveness of a grouting <br />program can be temporary. Grouting would fill the openings which existed at <br />the time of grouting, but progressive dissolution could open new seepage <br />pathways. <br /> <br />Following is a cost estimate for a cement grouting program on the Harvey Gap dam <br />seepage area: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.