Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-' <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Attachment V <br />. <br /> <br />.........O..O..U.I.I.HIHOc:O. <br /> <br />RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS <br /> <br />WATER-SEWER BOARD MEETING <br />SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />June 26, 1986 <br /> <br />Chairman Farr called the Water.Sewer Board meeting to order on Thursday, <br />June 26, 1986 at 4:40 p.m. 1n the City Co~ncfl Chambers, Civic Center Complex. <br /> <br />I. ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Present at the meeting were Board mernbers~ W.O. Farr, Robert Ruyle, Elmer <br />Rothe, David Clarkson, and Water Board Attorney Bl11 Sohlender. Also present <br />was City Manager Pete Morrell. From the Water and Sewer Department were <br />Director Mark Rybus and Engineers John Gauthiere..Oan Hawkins and Eric Wilkin- <br />son. <br /> <br />2. APPROVAL OF AND/OR ADDITIONS TO AGENDA. <br /> <br />The agenda was approved as presented. <br /> <br />3. APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH mE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD TO <br />PERFORM FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR. REHABILITATION OF COMANCHE RESERVOIR DAM, <br />PETERSON LAKE DAM AND TWIN LAKES DAM. <br /> <br />Mr. Rybus said an engineering firm has be~n selected to perform feasibility <br />studies for rehabilitation of the Comanch~. Peterson Lake and Twin lakes <br />Reservoir dams. He further stated the funds are available. that the City's <br />share will be 50% while the Colorado Water Conservation Board will fund the <br />other 50%. Total cost will be $137,120. <br /> <br />Mr. Bohlender said the Board must make a motion to authorize the staff to <br />enter into the contract. <br /> <br />The firm selected is Morrison-Knudsen Engineers. Inc. <br /> <br />Motion was made by David Clarkson and seconded by Elmer Rothe to authorize <br />the staff to enter Into a feasibility study contract with the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board. . Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />4. CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANIES' WATER <br />RIGHTS. <br /> <br />Mr. Rybus explained he received a ZAP letter earlier that morning in regard <br />to the offer made to purchase the surplus Great Western Sugar Company water. <br />Mr. Rybus said they had to notify us because Greeley made an offer on a certain <br />quantity of water, and their Dallas office has sold off a portion of that <br />water. so there is a reduced amount of water available. He further explained <br />Great Western is usi~g that sale as a basis to set an equitable price. <br /> <br />Mr. Rybus said Great Western thinks now the value of the C.B.T. water is $750 <br />per unit. for a total price of $1.566.000 for the remaining units. The value <br />established for the Greeley-Loveland water offered would be $1.2 million. for <br />a total value of $2,766,000. Mr. Rybus Said he did not want to mention pub- <br />licly the number Greeley offered for the water as it was a private bid. He <br />said. however. our total offer was less. as the Board had authorized him to <br />go to a limit of $2.5 million on the total package. <br /> <br />Mr. Rybus further explained that Great Western has gone to other water purveyors <br />and offered it to them at the same price stated in the letter. yet Great Wes- <br />tern's attorney did not want to give Greeley a formal rejection on its offer. <br />He then asked the Board to give staff direction on what it now wanted to do <br />with the offer. <br />