My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00553
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0022X
Contractor Name
West Anvil Water & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Webster Hi 11 Reservoir has a surface area of less than 1,000 <br />acres. <br /> <br />o The transbasin diversions would have to increase enouqh to serve <br />the needs of over 200,000 additional people. <br /> <br />o There would have to be an oil-shale industry in operation, <br />producing 150,000 barrels of oil per day. <br /> <br />While it is believed that all the above development conditions are <br />likely to occur, it will certainly be some time in the future before <br />the actual conditions of Scenario II are fully realized. It is <br />impossible to accurately predict when any or all of the Scenario II <br />conditions might be met, but it is unlikely that all of these <br />conditions will be realized before the year 2000 A.D. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Since the base case conditions are not likely to be met until some <br />time after the completion of the Webster Hill project, the adoption <br />of the base case lends a degree of conservativeness to the <br />feasibility study. <br /> <br />Even under Scenario III (a high rate of development), the reservoir <br />would still be entitled to capture 20,000 ac-ft every year except a <br />critical dry year. During a 100-year drought, the reservoir would <br />not be entitled to capture any water under these maximum development <br />conditions. Again, this would only constrain water availability to <br />the project if there were two consecutive drought years. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As explained earlier, WWE used a straight percentage approach to <br />determine demand for future projects, rather than a project-by- <br />project analysis as was used in the Una study. While this straight <br />percentage method has some advantages, it does not allow assessment <br />of the effect of certain large projects. Specifically, the Una <br />Reservoir, planned for a site 30 mi downstream of the Webster Hill <br />project, has a marked effect on water availability to the Webster <br />Hill Reservoir. The Una Reservoir is a relatively large project, <br /> <br />3686-a/6 <br /> <br />II-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.