My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00553
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0022X
Contractor Name
West Anvil Water & Power Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Hill's position. For example, the State of Colorado recently <br />published its official water rights abandonment list for the <br />Colorado River. The list contains a cumulative total of <br />125,000 cfs and 119,000 ac-ft of now defunct rights that were <br />formerly on the official water rights tabulation. Most of these <br />water rights were senior to the Webster Hill storage right. <br /> <br />The Webster Hi 11 project involves the following water rights on <br />the Colorado River: <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />Amount <br /> <br />Adjudication <br />Date <br /> <br />Appropriation <br />Date <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Webster Hill <br /> <br />Reservoir <br />Webster Hi 11 <br /> <br />Reservoir <br />Penstock <br /> <br />32,830 ac-ft <br /> <br />12/31171 <br /> <br />07/02170 <br /> <br />3,500 cfs <br /> <br />12/31176 <br /> <br />07/02170 <br /> <br />:. <br /> <br />2. Development of the Scenarios <br />It is in derivin9 the future water resource development <br />scenarios that the WWE Report is at vari ance with the approach <br />used in the Una Reservoir Project study. For the Una study, <br />the water rights senior in priority to the Una storage right <br />were arranged according to their magnitude above selected cutoff <br />values (flow rights above 50 cfs and storage rights above <br />5,000 ac-ft). The depletions from each of these rights were <br />then projected as to their assumed 1 ikel ihood of occurring and <br />were incorporated into their respective development scenario. <br />In contrast, the WWE study projected depletions of future water <br />development as a straight percentage of past development. Other <br />assumptions made by WWE are: 1) existing conditions reflect the <br />absolute water rights that are active, and 2) determining <br />projected future water use is more critical than predicting the <br />perfection of conditional water rights. However, only the <br />conditional water rights senior to Webster Hill's would change <br /> <br />3686-a/6 <br /> <br />II-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.