PROJ00545 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IlR.o.O"oFfO"UIlLrS"'NGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS -_._------~--,._-- ----~---,._--------,. -.--- -----------... --.--_._-~-------- Board of Trustees Merch 14, 1984 P,'-ge ~ communications with :Brian Hyde and .so was taken aback l.Jy their letter dated 3-9-84. Thompson said the materials for the project were submitted to the CWCB at least 6 weeks ago after conversation with them prior to design and the first response to submission of tllOSC materials was tllis 3-9-84 letter to L'Estrange. Dean Gordon said hC and L'Estrange had talked wi th a number of people at CWCB and he is concerned abou t the timing of the project if CWCD gets ~nvolved. Brian Hyde told hiDl today thllt Ollce CWCB has the information (which they do) there may be a response in 2 weeks. But Gordon said he fears eWeB will want to tie the Hyde Park studies into work that is being done for Pi tkin County and work bt:~i ng con templaled for Eagle County. If that happens, he said he'd be surprlGcd to see cwen complete that work in a year. He said he a.lso looked at the matter from the practical standpoint of obtaining illsur:1Dce. Althl1ugh tIle insurance is federal, it is brdkered by illsurance agellts. An agent he spoke with said that if the property were in a designated area the cost would probably be 259/$100 of insurance; i_r the property were not in a designated area the insurance could be lower or could go perhaps as lligh as 509/$100 of insurance. He added that he is not convinced th;.lt C\\"CB must review and approve the flood studies. After further discussion regarding insurance an~ building in a floodplain, Gordon said he had spent a lot of time reviewin~ Claycomb Engilleering's work and feels confident that their calculation~ meet the 'town's requirem~nt and would meet eWeB's as well. They are buildin~ .in a floodplain but only in that portion in which it is legal to do so as Ipng as certain requirement$ are met, The project does conform with the Town's regulations regarding building in a floodplain, Nick Goluba, attorney for Bert Lewis, said that L'Estrange's memo hits the nail on the head. CWCB wants an opportunity to check the engineer's figures and they have been given that opportunity. CWCB also reco~nends a larger study in cooperation with Pitkin and Eagtc Counties which is a lenath process and has no be~ring on the applications vefore the Board tonight. Darien asked if the town would be responsible r~r the buildings at Hyde Park in the event of a flood, Milwid said no as lon~ a~ tIle codes are followed. He suggested that a condition of approval or th~ Amended peu 11aster Plan be that, if applicabl@ and required by law, as detcrmillcd by the tOWll attorney, the CWCB revi ew and appro\'e the devc h~pl'r' ';:; flood pl a ins tudy prior to final pla.t approval. lIe felt it would be prudent for the town to reserve that right, L'Estrange pointed out that the Town l{~ll is in the 100 year floodplain. Trustee Carney asked ~bout the wetlands condition. Li~ton said it is there for the town's protectioll and it appears that tIle Corps map L'Estrange has shows that the lots in question are not in \\'l'tlands. L'Estrange said he spoke with ACOE Sander'~ who advised him that determination would have to be done on site. He also said that a condition of approval requires that the wetlands issoe be resolved prior to Pllase II. Ron Liston said he would like to address several issucs that came up at the last Board meeting. The first was the fact that some lots in Phase II would be isolated in the event of a 100 year flood. He said he could assure the Board that there"will always be access to those lots and that engineering detail would be shown when final engineering is done for Phase II. The roads will be designed so that there wi.11 be no floodillg over them. The second issue was that recreation facilitjes were to be built wjth Phase II; they have been relocated to occur with Phase I. The thil.d concern was direct access of the first 4 lots in Phase I to the main access road. He presented a sketch to the Board which places those lots on a secondary road. lIe said that sketch would be incorporated into the final plat for Phase I. The Board then discussed how the project ~ould be affected by t!le currentlY proposed highway bypass alignment. It was shown that if the bypass is built -it would isolate Phase I from Phase II but would not isolate lots within each Phase from each other. Elmer Claycomb noted that where the wetla! issue Illight be a problem lor l.htl Hyde Park developers, it would also be a problem for the Highway Dept. who must face exactly the s,~me restrictionS any developer must face. Li~t()n added that the floodplain issue would affect the bypass alignment also. Trustee Grant cxpre~~cd somE' COllcern for odd shaped lots and roads if the highway goes through. Liston said the highway