My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00540
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:22:24 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153697
Contractor Name
Norwood, Town of and Norwood Water Commission
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
FSL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />V-3 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A2. PRELIMINARY SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />1. Alternative ~ - pioeline From Gurlev Reservoir TQ <br />~ Storaae Reservoir. <br /> <br />Discussion. Under this option, a pipeline would be <br />extended from Gurley Reservoir to the present Town <br />storage reservoir. <br /> <br />This system would utilize existing storage in Gurley <br />Reservoir. Gurley Reservoir has a total storage <br />capacity of 11,432 AF. Norwood will only require <br />about 120 AF in winter from Gurley (168 AF total <br />minus 49 AF from water rights) or about 1.0% (in the <br />year 2035). <br /> <br />The pipeline would be for the sole use of the <br />Norwood water system and could be used during both <br />summer and winter months. There are feasible routes <br />on either the west or east side of Gurley Canyon. A <br />separate diversion point would be needed inside <br />Gurley Reservoir. The diversion system must be <br />designed to accommodate problems with icing and <br />shallow water depths in winter. The pipeline could <br />either be designed for pressurized flow or open <br />channel flow. Depending on which method is used, <br />pipe could either be PVC or ductile iron pipe and <br />would range in size from 6 to 8 inches. A <br />hydroelectric system to utilize the elevation drop <br />should be considered. <br /> <br />Feasibilitv. The pipeline will essentially use the <br />same water rights and the same amount of water that <br />is previously used out of Gurley Reservoir; however, <br />there will have to be changes in the bylaws and <br />perhaps in some of the me~hods of winter operations. <br />However, it would appear that the impact on storage <br />would be small since Norwood would only use 1% of <br />the capacity of Gurley Reservoir. <br /> <br />The supply can generally be considered reliable, <br />although additional investigation would be needed to <br />determine how much residual water remains in Gurley <br />Reservoir in winter. The pipeline will rely <br />entirely on gravity flow and may open up some <br />additional service area On Oak Hill. There may be <br />some construction problems with installation of the <br />pipeline due to presence of rock layers. Also, it <br />will cross a number of different parcels of land and <br />rights-of-way will have to be acquired. Some <br />revenue may be possible through installation of a <br />hydroelectric generation plant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.