My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00540
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:22:24 AM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:00:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153697
Contractor Name
Norwood, Town of and Norwood Water Commission
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Bill Number
FSL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />emptied, several people observed seeps and springs <br />in the area normally inundated by Gurley Reservoir. <br />Spring seepage was estimated at about .10 to .15 <br />cfs, some of which was seepage from mud, and the <br />balance from several springs. In 1965 or 1966, the <br />reservoir was drained. Seepage from the springs was <br />estimated to be less than 1/4 cfs. During 1988-89, <br />when Gurley Reservoir was drained for repairs, the <br />springs also seeped water. Due to silt deposits, <br />single point sources were hard to define, because <br />water dispersed in the silt and came up allover. <br />Two distinct "streams" were observed, one at a <br />single "garden hose" rate and the other at the rate <br />of four "garden hoses". Coffer dams were used <br />during construction which were said to be capable of <br />ponding approximately 1 1/2 acre feet. The time <br />required to fill behind the coffer dams with water <br />was one week. This would indicate that the <br />spring/seep rate was approximately 0.11 cfs. This <br />rate was noted to decrease with time, however. <br />other reports vary widely, indicating that springs <br />and seeps provided from very little to 1/4 cfs flow. <br /> <br />The existence of the springs past and present should <br />not be a contested issue: what is not known is what <br />their true capacity is, and therefore the quantity <br />of water produced which belongs to the Town. <br /> <br />Diversion Point. The decree allows Town diversion <br />in Section 6, T44N, R12W, where the pipeline of the <br />Town of Norwood taps said 'Maverick Gulch' (this is <br />in the vicinity of the old and current diversion). <br /> <br />Annual Compensation to Farmers'. Given that <br />priority No. 214 water is conveyed by Gurley Ditch, <br />which ditch is operated and maintained by Farmers' <br />for the conveyance of Farmers' water, the Town of <br />Norwood is required to annually pay $10.00 as <br />compensation to Farmers' for operation and <br />maintenance. <br /> <br />Beaver Creek and Tributaries. Water conveyed to <br />Gurley Reservoir from Beaver Creek and its <br />tributaries are not a part of Priority No. 214, and <br />therefore, the Town does not derive any right to <br />these waters as a result of the 1936 court decree. <br /> <br />b. Norwood Pipeline. <br /> <br />General. Two water rights pertain to the Norwood <br />pipeline. Priority No. 385 is absolute for 1/2 cfs. <br />Priority No. 425, which began as a conditional <br />right, is, as of 1987 an absolute right for 1/4 cfs. <br />The point of diversion is on 'Maverick Gulch' <br /> <br />IV-22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.