My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153349 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153349 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2010 2:55:18 PM
Creation date
10/6/2006 12:00:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153349
Contractor Name
Brook Forest Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
9
County
Jefferson
Bill Number
SB 80-67
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. Treated Water Storage Tanks - Three storage tanks represent the storage <br /> <br /> <br />capacity for the water supply system. Table-8 summarizes the basic data for <br /> <br /> <br />these tanks: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 8 <br />STORAGE TANKS DATA <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />STORAGE TANK IDENTIFICATION <br /> <br />CAPACITY <br />(gallons) <br /> <br />BOTTOM OF TANK ELEVATION <br /> <br />Tank No. 1 <br /> <br />25,000 <br /> <br />8160 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Tank No. 2 <br /> <br />50,000 <br /> <br />8320 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Tank No, 3 <br /> <br />42,000 <br /> <br />8420 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The total storage capacity of 117,000 gallons represents 2.9 times the <br />daily production of the pumping rate decreed to the district. However, based <br />on an assumed demand of 80 GPCD, 3.5 persons per residence, and 211 single <br />family residences, the ratio of storage capacity to potential daily demand is <br />only 1.98. A ratio of 3.0 to 3.5 is generally considered to be desirable for <br />similar water supply systems. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />All three tanks have experienced some type of freezing problems dur1ng tne <br /> <br /> <br />past winter seasons. Tank No. 3 has experienced the most severe freezing prob- <br /> <br /> <br />lems due to its partially shaded location. It has been deformed structurally <br /> <br /> <br />by ice pressures near the top of the tank. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-40- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.