Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6.6 Hydrology <br /> <br />The watershed area impacting the proposed dam site is shown in Figure 6.6. <br /> <br />6.6.1 Surface Water <br /> <br />Long term Stream flow records for the Dry Fork of Minnesota ereek are limited. Arco eoal <br />eompany installed stream monitoring equipment in June 1977, as part of the environmental <br />permitting process for the Mount Gunnison Mine. Based on stream flow data collected during <br />the years 1978, 1979, and 1980, the estimated mean annual runoff for the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota ereek is 1,100 acre-feet (Armstrong, 1980). <br /> <br />Stream flow records for both the upper and lower reaches of the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek <br />were provided by the West Elk Coal Company, Inc. These records provide statistical data <br />regarding the discharge rate and volume for the water years 1987 and 1988. The recording <br />station for the upper reach is located in the SE 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 2, T 14S, R 90W. The <br />recording station for the lower reach is located downstream of Minnesota Reservoir in the SW <br />1/4, Section 31, T 13S, R 90W. The stream flow records suggest that the period of snowmelt <br />runoff commences in late May, peaks in mid-June, and is completed during July. Stream flow <br />discharge records for the lower and upper reaches are provided in Appendix e. Figure 6.7 <br />illustrates the seasonal variation in streamflow for the upper and lower reaches of the Dry Fork. <br />Discrepancies in flows between the upper and lower reaches is primarily due to storage and <br />discharge of flows within the existing Minnesota Reservoir. <br /> <br />6.6.2 Groundwater <br /> <br />Groundwater quantity and quality data for the project site is not available. It is anticipated that <br />groundwater flow is approximately parallel to axis of the Dry Fork of Minnesota ereek, and is <br />primarily confined quaternary alluvial and colluvial deposits within the creek basin. <br /> <br />7.0 SITE SELECTION STUDY <br /> <br />7.1 Site Selection Methodology <br /> <br />SRK performed a site selection study to characterize, evaluate, and identify the most favorable <br />site Cor the proposed New Minnesota Dam and Reservoir. The formal site selection process <br />included: <br /> <br />· Regional screening in which the study area is defined, potential sites are identified, and <br />unsuitable sites are rejected; <br /> <br />· Site characterization whereby topographic, geologic, hydrologic, and environmental <br />conditions are assessed on a site-by-site basis; <br /> <br />11 <br />