My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00533
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00533
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:27 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:59:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153367
Contractor Name
International Engineering Company
Water District
0
County
Rio Blanco
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
552
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Oil Shale Diversion Point <br />Sheep Creek <br />Piceance Creek <br />Yellow Creek <br />*Inc1udes 6000 acre-feet <br /> <br />Annual Diversion* (acre-feet) <br />26,300 <br /> <br />13,100 <br />13,100 <br /> <br />originally allocated for coal. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Severa 1 water' de 1 i very poi nts were incorporated into the operat i on study for <br />each alternative plan. Diversion points for the agricultural and coal water <br />supplies werE' in the upper basin, while municipal and domestic water was <br />assumed to bE left in the river for diversion in the vicinity of Meeker. <br />Oil shale demands were diverted from the mainstem of the White River at <br />three locaticns: near Sheep Creek, near Piceance Creek, and near Yellow <br />Creek. The annual water delivery at each of these three locations was <br />assumed to be as follows: <br /> <br />Return Flows <br />The industrial water deliveries were assumed to be totally consumed and <br />therefore represented a total depletion to the river system. Municipal, <br />domest ic, and agricu ltura 1 water deli veri es, however, wi 11 not be <br />one-hundred percent consumptively used and the operation studies had to <br />account for the return flow component. <br /> <br />It was assumed that sprinkler irrigation systems. would be installed on the <br />project's lands and that the cropping pattern would be more diversified <br />than the present. It was ,estimated that 2'5 percent of the water divertl~d <br />for agricultural use, 4500 acre-feet per year, would return to the Whi:e <br />River at locations upstream of the stream gage point above Meeker. It was <br />assumed that 50 percent of the return flow would occur in the month of <br />diversion and that the remaining 50 percent would reach the river in the <br />month following. <br /> <br />Return flow from municipal and domestic use varies during the season. It <br />was estimated that 50 percent of the March-through-September use and 80 <br />percent of the winter use would be returned to the river. The annual volume <br />of return flow from project-supplied municipal and domestic water was <br /> <br />V-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.