Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I II-4 <br /> <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />were proportionately decreased because the yield of the Yellow Jacket water <br />right is limited to a quantity less than the potential combined demand by <br />agricultural" municipal, and industrial users. The total annual oil shale <br />water demand used in the study was 46,500 acre-feet. The monthly <br />distribution is shown in Table III-I. <br /> <br />It is not prilcticable at this study level to provide water at convenient <br />locations for' individual interest users, so three general delivery locations <br />were selected to satisfy their needs. It was assumed that each entity would <br />provide its c,wn facilities for delivering water to the place of use. The <br />principal are,as of use were: 1) the Upper Piceance Basin on the left side of <br />Piceance CreE'k, 2) Lower Piceance Creek on the divide between Piceance and <br />Yellow Creek!, and 3) the Yellow Creek Basin. <br /> <br />About one-half of the total demands were allocated for delivery into the <br />headwaters of Piceance Creek. A pumping plant at t~e mouth of Sheep Creek <br />would pump water through a pipeline over the divide into the headwaters of <br />Fourteen Mile Creek, a tributary to Piceance Creek. The remaining half of. <br />the oil shale allocation would be left in the river for diversion by the <br />participating energy companies. For planning purposes, it was assumed that <br />these diversion points would be at the mouths of Pij:eance Creek and Yellow <br />Creek. <br /> <br />Coal <br />The status of coal development in the basin is uncertain at this time. <br />However, one firm has an option to purchase up to 18,000 acre-feet of water <br />annually from the Yellow Jacket Project. The location of the coal mine is <br />about six miles northeast of Meeker. Although the option provides for <br />delivery at the Yellow Jacket point of diversion, it is more convenient and <br />economical to convey water for both agricultural and coal uses in the sane <br />facilities. Therefore, the study assumed that water would be delivered in <br />the vicinity of the mine and that distribution at the site would be the <br />responsibility of the operator. <br />