Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, II <br />I <br /> <br />land in the White and Yampa River Basins, was presented <br />report. This project was not authorized for construction by <br />environmental concerns and right-of-way problems. It was <br />1972 to include industrial and municipal uses, but was also <br />for similar reasons. <br /> <br />in a 1968 USBR <br />Congress due to <br />reformulated in <br />not authorized, <br /> <br />A compromise plan, which called for the development of 126,400 acre-feet of <br />water for oil shale, coal, irrigation, and municipal use, was agreed upon in <br />1976. This plan was described in a concluding report published by the USBR <br />in 1980. Because of the uncertainties associated with industrial water <br />demands at that time, the USBR terminated the study. <br /> <br />Recent oil shale activities in the White River Basin have rekindled an <br />interest in developing the YJWCD water rights. This interest has resulted <br />in the authorization of the Yellow Jacket Project Study. <br /> <br />Scope of Study <br /> <br />Study Area <br />The study area was defined as all land within the Colorado portion of the <br />White River Basin which could utilize the YJWCD's water rights. This area <br />was to include lands and demand areas within, or in reasonable proximity to, <br />the YJWCD. The legislative authority specifically limited the consideration <br />of any storage and diversion facilities to the White River and tributaries <br />upstream of its confluence with Piceance Creek. The study area and <br />locations of existing features are shown on Figure 1-1. <br /> <br />Study Activities <br />The primary activities to be undertaken during the course of the study were <br />the collection and analysis of water supply data, identification of water <br />demands, development of alternative plans, water operation studies, <br />preliminary design of facilities, and identification of funding options. <br />The study was to be conducted using existing data with no additional field <br />work unless specifically authorized by the CWCB. Alternative plans were to <br /> <br />1-2 <br />