Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chanter <br /> <br />Brief Description <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Introduction and background information. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Characteristics of the study area and existing institutions, <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />Water rights and hydrologic analyses to determine the available water supply for potential <br />projects. <br /> <br />IV <br /> <br />Water demands of potential cropping patterns and improved irrigation water deliveries. <br /> <br />V <br /> <br />Identification and selection of project elements and formulation of four alternative projects. <br /> <br />VI <br /> <br />Evaluation and comparison of alternative projects. <br /> <br />VII <br /> <br />Institutional considerations. <br /> <br />VIII <br /> <br />Discussion of the Phase Two decision. <br /> <br />The Phase One study has been based on existing data and records available to the public. The plan of study did <br /> <br /> <br />not include gathering of new data such as installation of stream or diversion gaging stations, measurements of <br /> <br /> <br />flows, field instrument surveys, soil sampling. mapping, geologic foundation drilling or seismic investigations. <br /> <br /> <br />Maximum use has been made of data from previous investigations and studies by others. Estimates and <br /> <br /> <br />assumptions have been based on this data, limited field observations and several technical review sessions with <br /> <br /> <br />the study advisors. <br /> <br />1-4 <br />