Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Contacts will be made with knowledgeable communications utilities experts to evaluate the potential <br />for using the pipeline trepch for laying a fiber optic cable. Other cost-sharing opportunities (gas <br />pipelines, electrical transmission cables, etc.) also will be identified and evaluated during Task 3.0. <br /> <br />The Study Team will identify order-of-magnitude capital and operating costs for the pipeline to focus <br />the financing assessment in Phase II. During Phase I, an abbreviated examination will be made of the <br />magnitude of benefits and beneficiaries, revenue raising mechanisms, and types of funding avenues <br />that will be pursued in the study. <br /> <br />A description and costs of the "no-action" alternative will be developed as a baseline against which <br />alternatives can be compared. The no-action alternative would involve continuing with current <br />practices and dealing with increasingly expensive water treatment processes. <br /> <br />Alternatives will be compared based primarily on cost, but with consideration of potential <br />institutional, regulatory, and financial constraints. <br /> <br />Phase II <br /> <br />Task 4.0 - Mapping <br />USGS I :24,000 scale topographic mapping, supplemented with recent aerial photos available through <br />NRCS, will be adequate for Phase 1. USGS Digital Line Graph Data (in GIS fonnat) will provide <br />additional infonnation and is readily available for use in Phase I as well. For Phase II, we intend to <br />use available aerial photos from NRCS to assist in the alignment for feasibility review. <br /> <br />Task 5.0 - Reconnaissance <br />Alignment work completed in Phase I will be based primarily on existing maps and aerial <br />photography, with limited field verification. Task 5.0 will involve field reconnaissance by a small <br />team of specialists to finalize the selected alignment, based on hydraulic, environmental, geologic, <br />land use, and related factors. This reconnaissance will help to provide better cost estimates because <br />avoiding rock excavation, wetlands, geologic hazards, and sensitive species will reduce costs and <br />avoid pennitting delays. The Task 5.0 work will involve an initial evaluation of these issues; <br />however, further evaluation will likely be required during the design phase. <br /> <br />Task 6.0 - Phase II Feasibility-Level Designs <br />After the basic alignment is finalized in Task 5.0, our Study Team will complete the Phase II designs <br />of the key project features using the data base available. The designs will be completed to a level of <br />detail sufficient to support development of budget ranges for project implementation and the <br />economic and financial analyses typically completed for CWCB-supported feasibility studies. Work <br />products will include: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Feasibility-level design criteria for basic design and operational issues requirements <br />Pipeline alignment drawings in 11 x 17 inch fonnat <br />General requirements for: <br />o Pipe and trench for up to four typical installations <br />o Stream and road crossings <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />II GEl Consultants, Inc. <br /> <br />3 <br />