Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br /> <br />VI. PROJECT COSTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A. General Information <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For each of the two alternatives presented in Chapter-V, a detailed <br /> <br /> <br />quant ity take off and .construct ion cos test imate was prepared and itemized <br /> <br /> <br />in Tables 5 and 6. Also shown in the tables are the associated unit costs, <br /> <br /> <br />engineering, surveying and testing costs, land acquisitions and contingencies. <br /> <br /> <br />The unit costs were developed from recent construction bids for projects of <br /> <br /> <br />similar nature in addition to WRC experience. A 15% contingency was used due <br /> <br /> <br />to the detail of the preliminary design and construction cost estimate. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For the land acquisition costs, only a small portion of the required land <br /> <br /> <br />was considered to be purchased. Most of the surrounding land is undeveloped <br /> <br /> <br />and the City of Lafayette can obtain the land through the open space dedication <br /> <br /> <br />for development or through negotiations. A nominal amount ($25,000 and $30,000) <br /> <br /> <br />was included for land acquisitions to cover small parcel acquisitions, admini- <br /> <br /> <br />strative costs, or other miscellaneous cost associated with negotiations for <br /> <br /> <br />the land. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Projected Escalation Costs are based upon the Engineering News Record <br /> <br /> <br />Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the years 1978 through 1980. Over this 2-year <br /> <br /> <br />period, the CCI has increased approximately 17%. The construction of this <br /> <br /> <br />project is not anticipated until 1983, which is also a 2-year period and there- <br /> <br /> <br />fore the projected escalation is 17%. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A summary of the costs for both alternatives is presented in the table below: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ITEM <br /> <br />PROJECT COST S~UffiY* <br /> <br />REHABILITATION <br />(Table-5) <br /> <br />ENLARGEMENT <br />(Table-6) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Construction (I to V) <br />.Contingencies (VI) <br />Projected Escalation (VII) <br />E~gineering (IX) <br />Land Acquisition (X) <br />TOTAL PROJECT COSTS <br /> <br />916,000 <br />138,000 <br />I 79 ,000 <br />160,000 <br />25,000 <br />$1,418,000 <br /> <br />1,418,000 <br /> <br />213,000 <br /> <br />277 ,000 <br /> <br />200,000 <br /> <br />30,000 <br /> <br />$2,138,000 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Refer to Tables 5 and 6 for details of costs <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-26- <br />