My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00504
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:46 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153334
Contractor Name
Henry Waneka Mutual Reservoir Company c/o City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
6
County
Boulder
Bill Number
FSA
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />layer was considered confined to the southeast portion of the embankment. <br />Based upon the soil borings. the thickness of the layer was estimated <br />at 3 to 5 feet and the length of the layer was estimated at 500 feet. <br />The seepage quantity was estimated to be from 10 to 15 AF/year. ~lereas <br />condition "B" results in a higher estimated seepage loss, the confidence <br />level of the data.is less than condition "A", due to the additional <br />as sumpt ions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />C. Alternatives <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. General Review <br /> <br /> <br />The value of the storage to a municipal water system and the amount <br /> <br /> <br />of storage needed has been previously discussed in Chapter-IV. Therefore, <br /> <br /> <br />the viable alternatives are those which increase the amount of storage <br /> <br /> <br />available to the system at the least cost. A review of the possible solu- <br /> <br /> <br />tions resulted in the following alternatives being selected for a more de- <br /> <br /> <br />tailed analysis: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- Dam Rehabilitation <br /> <br /> <br />2 - Dam Enlargement <br /> <br /> <br />3 - Reduce Seepage Quantity <br /> <br /> <br />A discussion of each of the alternatives is presented below. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2.- Rehabilitation <br /> <br /> <br />Due to the present storage restriction by the SED, the usable capacity <br /> <br /> <br />of the reservoir has been reduced by approximately 184 acre-feet (see Area <br /> <br /> <br />Capacity Curve on Figure-II). This restriction can be lifted if specified <br />. <br /> <br />improvements are made to the dam (see Appendix-C). The required improvements <br /> <br /> <br />for this alternative are shown on Figures IV (page 55) and V (page 56) and <br /> <br /> <br />consist of reshaping the embankment (38,000 CY), adding riprap (4,600 CY), <br /> <br /> <br />replacing the spillway (170 CY), repairs or replacement of the outlet works, <br /> <br /> <br />and other miscellaneous items (refer also to Table-5, pages 43 and 44). The <br /> <br /> <br />required land acquisition (approximately 20 acres) is shown on Figure-IV and <br /> <br /> <br />is based upon obtaining the property in the flood pool as well as that land <br /> <br /> <br />required for the construction of the spillway and dam embankment. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-22- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.