Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />V. PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A. General <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> The ne ed for storage in the Lafayette water system has been investigated <br />and identified as one of the higher priority items for the City, specifically <br />the renovation of Waneka Reservoir. The present storage requirements are <br /> <br />estimated to be approximately 2,000 acre-feet, of which the City's share of the <br /> <br /> <br />current storage in Waneka Reservoir is about 260 acre-feet. Therefore, a signi- <br /> <br /> <br />ficant amount of additional storage is required. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For this analysis, two alternatives were investigated, Rehabilitation <br /> <br /> <br />and Enlargement of the dam and reservoir. The Rehabilitation alternative <br /> <br /> <br />consists of correcting those deficiencies identified by the State Engineer's <br /> <br /> <br />Office such that the storage restrictions can be lifted. The Enlargement <br /> <br /> <br />alternative consists of increasing the available storage by raising the height <br /> <br /> <br />of the dam. Seepage control was also investigated as part of both alternatives <br /> <br /> <br />and consisted of evaluating various facilities to decrease seepage losses thereby <br /> <br /> <br />increasing the. water available for use. Presented in the following sections <br /> <br /> <br />are the evaluation of .the existing dam and evaluation of the three alternatives. <br /> <br /> <br />The project costs are presented in Chapter-VI, and the financial evaluation is <br /> <br /> <br />presented in Chapter-VII. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />B. Existing Dam Evaluation <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 - Inspection <br /> <br /> <br />As part of the Dam Safety Program, the State Engineer's Office has <br /> <br /> <br />inspected Waneka Dam, as well as other dams 1n the State. The inspection <br /> <br /> <br />authority is pursuant to 1973 CRS 37-80-101 et seq. The existing inspection <br /> <br /> <br />reports, which were reviewed by WRC staff, identified various problems with <br /> <br /> <br />the dam and reservoir beginning on August 5, 1977. The deficiences identi- <br /> <br />fied included: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-16- <br />