My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00504
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:46 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153334
Contractor Name
Henry Waneka Mutual Reservoir Company c/o City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
6
County
Boulder
Bill Number
FSA
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The existing dam consists of a 3000 foot long horseshoe shaped earth fill <br />embankment with two gated outlets and an emergency spillway. The height of the <br />embankment at the maximum section is approximately 35 feet. The present reservoit <br />surface area is approximately 55 acres. Deficiencies in the embankment and other <br />appurtenant structures have been identified by the State Engineer's Office (SED), <br />beginning in 1977. A letter from the SEO to the HWMRC restricting the storage <br />in the reservoir to 3 feet below the crest of the emergency spillway was issued <br />May. 23, 1979, until the deficiencies were corrected. Subsequently, the City <br />of Lafayette and the HWMRC through the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) <br />entered into an agreement with WRC to evaluate the feasibility of improving the <br />dam. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The investigation of the structure by WRC verified the deficiencies noted <br />by the State (see Chapter V). The investigation included a geologic drilling and <br />testing program, a slope stability analysis, and seepage analysis. A hydrologi- <br />cal analysis was previously performed by WRC. Several alternatives were considered <br />which improved the structure and increased the storage capabilities. Two alter- <br />natives were selected for detailed evaluation, rehabilitation and enlargement <br />(refer to Section V-C of this report). The project costs (Chapter-VI) and the <br />economic feasibility (Chapter-VII) were then evaluated for the alternatives. <br />The enlargement alternative has been found to be financially sound (Table-Il) and <br />is therefore recommended by WRC for construction. Other recommendations (Chapter- <br />VIII) included additional stock purchased by the City of Lafayette and continued <br />water conservation measures by the Lafayette water users. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.