My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00484
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00484
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:45 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:57:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153788
Contractor Name
Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
3
County
Weld
Bill Number
FSL
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />STATE O~OLORADO <br /> <br />I) <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1 31 3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866,3441 <br />FAX: 13031 866-4474 <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Covernol <br /> <br />January 15, 1997 <br /> <br />/ilmes 5. Lochhetld <br />Executive DireCfOf, ONR <br /> <br />Oaries Clile, p.E. <br />Diredor, ewes <br /> <br />Mr. Ed A, Toms, P,E, <br />ECI <br />5660 Greenwood Plaza Blvd" #500 <br />Englewood, CO 80111-2403 <br /> <br />Re: Plan of Study for Greeley and Loveland Irrig, System Rehab, <br /> <br />Dear Ed: <br /> <br />We have reviewed the Plan of Study for the Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company <br />rehabilitation study submitted with your letter of January 9 and have the following <br />concerns: <br /> <br />1. A more concise statement of the Study Objective would be helpful, The study <br />objective could be stated in one or two sentences, <br /> <br />2, In Task 4 - Alternative Development, we would like to suggest the approach that <br />is outlined on page 17 (Sections 3,2,4 through 3,2,6) of the Construction Fund <br />Guidelines, That approach would involve first identifYing structural and non- <br />structural plan elements, then a preliminary evaluation of plan elements to <br />determine which are suitable for further analysis, and finally formulating <br />alternatives using those plan elements which are carried forward from the first two <br />steps of the process, I think this may have been what was intended in Task 4 but <br />the concept doesn't seem completely clear in the pas, <br /> <br />3, It's not clear in Task 5 how the alternatives screening process will take place and <br />when and how the final alternative(s) will be identified, The descriptions of <br />Study Products don't indicate where in the study process this task will wind up, <br />The presentations to the board of the Greeley and Loveland Company should <br />probably be a part of this task rather than a separate task, <br /> <br />4, We would like to suggest that a Financial Plan for the Selected Alternative be <br />added as a task in the pas, This is somewhat different than the financial <br />screening in the alternatives evaluation in that it provides a more detailed plan for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.