Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'\. <br /> <br />INSPECTION REPORT <br /> <br />SU BJECT: Bootleg Reservoir Dam, C- <br />W. Div. 1 , W. Dist. 1 <br /> <br />TYPE: 7 <br /> <br />DATE OF INSPECTION: October 21, 1982 <br /> <br />DATE OF LAST INSPECTION: April 3, 1978 <br /> <br />HAZARD CLASSIFICATION: M <br /> <br />DATE: November 12, '1982 <br /> <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />The purpose of this inspection was to perform a safety eva luation of Bootleg <br />Reservoir Dam in accordance with Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, 37-87-107. <br />During this inspection, I wa s accompanied by Lawrence Gerkin, Manager of the <br />Henrylyn Irrigation District. This structure, located across the Box Elder Creek <br />drainage, is used by the Henrylyn Irrigation District as a flood water retarding <br />reservoir. The outlet gates on this reservoir are normally open,allowing stream- <br />flows to pass through the reservoir. However, should a large flow occur in the <br />Box Elder Creek dra inage which exceeds the adjusted capacity of the outlet <br />structure, flood waters will be retained in the reservoir basin,being released at <br />a slower rate through the outlet structure. Under normal conditions, this struc- <br />ture is empty impounding no water and the reservoir basin is farmed. On Septem- <br />. ber 14, 1982, a significant flood occurred in the upper reaches of Box Elder <br />Creek dra inage. As a result, significant flows entered the Bootleg basin causing <br />the reservoir to fill nearly to the elevation of the east spillway in approximately <br />four hours. Releases were made at a rate of approximately 350 cfs at a maximum <br />flow ra te causing the reservoir to empty in approximately 3.5 days. Weather <br />during this inspection was favorable and did not adversely affect inspection <br />activities. <br /> <br />Upstream Slope -- The upstream face of most of the embankment is protected <br />against wave action by a single slab of concrete facing laid.at a slope of approxi- <br />mately 1.5: 1. As can be seen on the accompanying pictures, the condition of <br />the upstream concrete facing. is poor with areas of significant deteriomtionnoted-. <br />'- <br />Weeds are grOWing through the concrete facing at nearly every vertical const~- <br />tion joint. In addition, there is' evidence of rodent activity underneath the con- <br />crete facing. This rodent activity in some areas has removed the support from <br />behind the facing causing!?ome settlement and collapse of the concrete facing <br />into these underlying voids. In addition; trees and brush are growing in some <br />of these deteriorated areas which further aid in deteriorating the fa"cing. Near <br />the upstream shoulder of the crest, a short 6 -inch high parapet wall was original- <br />ly constructed. In many area, support behind this parapet wall has been removed <br />and the parapet wa 11 has been displaced in the downstream direction and in m?ny <br />areas is currently non-existent. <br />