Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />'I <br />il <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2.2.3 Previous Studies <br /> <br />In order to evaluate possible alternatives for providing an adequate and reliable water transmission <br />system, the District retained WEI to conduct a feasibility study of the Plateau Creek pipeline. The <br />results of WEI study were presented in an October 1987 report titled, "Feasibility Study Plateau <br />Creek Pipeline". <br /> <br />The WEI report presented six alternatives to provide raw water to the District's treatment plant. <br />The recommended alternative was to augment the existing 24-inch pipeline with a larger parallel <br />pipeline. This larger pipeline could be constructed in phases as need arose and cross-connected to <br />the existing pipeline to form an integrated water delivery system. <br /> <br />WEI's alternative considers construction of the upgrade pipeline in three phases. The first phase <br />would consist of approximately 8,620 feet of 42-inch diameter and 13,200 feet of 36-inch diameter <br />pipeline. The larger pipeline would be constructed in Plateau Canyon and along the Colorado River <br />to bypass the tunnel. The smaller pipeline would be constructed in the Plateau Creek area along <br />the Highway 65. Sections of Plateau Creek are to be armored to protect the 24-inch diameter <br />pipeline and minimize the potential for pipeline breaks during flooding. The second and third <br />phases will each add approximately 15,625 feet of36-inch diameter pipe and the necessary armoring <br />for sections of Plateau Creek. <br /> <br />2.2.4 Rationale for Feasibility Study Amendment <br /> <br />Following review and evaluation of WEI's report, it was determined that the recommended <br />alternative route for the pipeline presented special regulatory and engineering considerations which <br />would require additional evaluation prior to the final route selection. In October 1990, the District <br />retained SRK to conduct additional studies and further evaluate the feasibility and requirements <br />for construction of the pipeline in the vicinity of the confluence of Plateau Creek and the Colorado <br />River. After studying the problems associated with the old raw water delivery system and reviewing <br />the work performed by WEI, SRK in collaboration with BLI determined that an alternate delivery <br />system may be feasible for this section. This alternative consists of a new tunnel to be constructed <br />parallel and adjacent to the existing Plateau Creek raw water supply tunnel. <br /> <br />2.3 Scope of Work <br /> <br />The scope of work for this feasibility study amendment was to perform a detailed evaluation of the <br />technical, permitting and financial considerations for the pipeline bypass alternative versus the <br />SRKIBLI tunnel alternative. The scope of work was limited only to the portion of the phase I <br /> <br />6 <br />