Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />Feasibility Re\lort for Dam Safety Modifications to DeWeese Dam <br />April 22, 1997 <br /> <br />face of the dam with manually-operated lifts at the dam crest. The dam is classified by the <br />Colorado State Engineer's Office (SEO) as an Intermediate, Class II dam. <br /> <br />As early as the 1970s, reports of arumal inspections of the dam by the SEO have noted <br />significant deterioration of the concrete and a generally poor observed condition of the two crest <br />raise sections. Recent SEO inspection reports (1994 to present) have stated that storage <br />restrictions will be imposed if the Company does not take appropriate action to improve the <br />condition of the two crest raise sections. Independent inspections by GEl Consultants, Inc, <br />(GEl) and others [1, 2] have resulted in conclusions consistent with the SEO inspections. The <br />principal dam safety issues to be resolved concern the generally poor condition of the concrete <br />in the two crest raises and the ability of the raise sections to safely withstand all reasonable <br />loading conditions, <br /> <br />The concrete in the crest raise sections is exhibiting considerable deterioration, generally in the <br />form of spalling and pattern cracking, This deterioration is probably the result of freeze-thaw <br />weathering and erosion due to overtopping flows. These effects may have been initiated and <br />accelerated by poor concrete quality and poor placement techniques, Presently, the surface <br />deterioration in some areas extends as deep as 6 inches or more below the original surface of the <br />concrete, exposing steel reinforcement in Some areas. The lower crest raise section is in <br />generally poorer condition than the upper crest raise section, probably due in large part to lower <br />quality concrete. Deterioration of the concrete in the lower crest raise has been reported to <br />extend as deep as 18 inches, In addition, nUmerous areas of efflorescence can be seen on the <br />downstream surfaces of the concrete, indicating water seepage through the crest raise sections. <br />This seepage could be the result of cracks extending through the concrete, relatively porous <br />concrete, or poor bonding of the raise concrete to the original dam. <br /> <br />The structural stability of the crest raise sections is not adequate under all loading conditions, <br />In general, the stability of existing concrete gravity dams, such as DeWeese, is evaluated under <br />three primary loading conditions: usual, unusual, and extreme. Required factors of safety for <br />these loading conditions are established by engineering practice and are set forth in the SEO's <br />Rules and Regulations for Dams in Colorado [6]. The usual loading condition assumes that the <br />reservoir level and the tailwater level are at their normal water surface elevations and requires <br />a computed factor of safety 3,0 for sliding and compressive stresses, The unusual loading <br />condition assumes that the reservoir level and the tailwater lever are at their design flood water <br />surface elevations and requires a computed factor of safety of 2,0, The extreme loading <br />condition assumes reservoir and tail water surface levels consistent with the normal loading <br />condition, together with loading from the design earthquake. The computed factor of safety <br />required for the extreme loading condition is 1.0, Previous analyses of the existing crest raise <br />sections at DeWeese Dam have indicated that the crest structure does not meet the stability <br />requirements for the usual loading condition or the unusual loading condition and does meet the <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, lnc, <br /> <br />96006\R.EPORTS\FEAS\TEXT.NEW <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />