My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153773 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153773 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:44 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:55:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153773
Contractor Name
Morrison, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
9
County
Jefferson
Bill Number
HB 95-1155
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C. WATER TREATMENT <br /> <br />Treatment Processes <br />It has been established that a conventional made rapid sand type plant is required (and <br />appropriate) to treat Bear Creek raw water for potable use. The basic process train includes: <br /> <br />. Addition of flocculent chemicals; also, possibly chemicals for pH/alkalinity adjustment to <br />produce a non-corrosive water. <br /> <br />. Rapid Mixing <br /> <br />. Flocculation <br /> <br />. Sedimentation <br /> <br />. Filtration using multi-media and, optiohally, a filter-aid polymer. <br /> <br />. Disinfection, primarily a chlorine residual. <br /> <br />In addition, because of the nature of the raw water, provisions should be made to control taste, <br />odor, and other trace organics. Such provisions could include ozonation, potassium <br />permanganate, or powdered activated carbof1 (PAC). This decision can be made as a part of <br />final plant design, and need not be resolved in the Master Plan. <br /> <br />Alternatives to be resolved during system Planning involve location and sizing of proposed <br />treatment facilities. Three altematives were formulated for analysis: <br /> <br />Alternative C-1. Retain the existing plant site and expand capacity there, eventually to <br />approximately 2.0 MGD. <br /> <br />Alternative C-2. Abandon the existing plant and construct a new plant below Cooley Reservoir. <br />The initial capacity would be 1.0 MGD, with provisions for expansion to 2.0 MGD. <br /> <br />Alternative C-3. Retain the existing plant and expand capacity to 1.0 MGD. In the future <br />construct a second plant below Cooley Reservoir as required to obtain ultimate required capacity. <br /> <br />The present plant was built with a minimal bUdget, and deficiencies have been acknowledged. <br /> <br />70-080.035:MSTR.PlN <br /> <br />11I-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.