Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ <br />i ) <br />'. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />TASK El3.0 FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />Puroose: Evaluate the financial attractiveness of alternatives defmed in subtasks E7.1 to E7.8. <br /> <br />MethodoloIN: Capital costs (including construction costs, contingency costs, and engineering and <br /> <br />administrative costs) and operating, maintenance, and replacement (O,M&R) costs will be <br /> <br />estimated for the facilities associated with each alternative defined in subtasks E7.1 to E7.8 <br /> <br />(excluding E.73) at a reconnaissance level of detail. The total capital cost figures for all <br /> <br />alternatives will be annualized using three fmancing scenarios and added to the estimated <br /> <br />annual O,M&R costs to estimate a total annual project cost. The three financing scenarios <br /> <br />used will be: <br /> <br />Scenario <br /> <br />Descriotion <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />One-half CWCB loan at 5 percent interest payable over 40 years and <br /> <br />one-half bonds issued by SMWCD at 10 percent payable over 30 <br /> <br />years. (Same as Scenario A in the Interim Report). <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />A 100 percent CWCB loan at 5 percent interest payable over 40 <br /> <br />years. (It is the current policy of the Board of the CWCB to make <br /> <br />loans for 50 percent of the capital cost of a project). (Same as <br /> <br />Scenario C in the Interim Report). <br /> <br />34 <br />